| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Under Rule 240.14a-12 | |
| ☒ | No fee required. | |||
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11. | |||
Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Our Shareholders:
Notice is hereby given that the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Regency Centers Corporation will be held virtually, via live webcast,exclusively online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022REG2024 on Friday, April 29, 2022,Wednesday, May 1, 2024, beginning at 8:00 A.M., Eastern Time. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and submit questions during the meeting by visiting the above website and following the instructions.
The meeting will be held for the following purposes:
| 1. | To elect as directors the 11 nominees named in the attached proxy statement, to serve until the |
| 2. | To approve, in a non-binding vote, an advisory resolution approving the company’s executive compensation for fiscal year |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as |
| 4. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any |
The accompanying proxy statement more fully describes these matters.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 10, 20228, 2024 will be entitled to vote and participate innotice of the Annual Meeting.
Please be aware that if you own shares in a brokerage account, you must instruct your broker how to vote your shares. Nasdaq Stock Market rules do not allow your broker to vote your shares without your instructions onMeeting and any of the above proposals except the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Please exercise your right as a shareholderadjournments or postponements thereof, and to vote on all proposals, including the election of directors, by instructing your broker by proxy.matters above.
The Annual Meeting will be virtual-only, held exclusively online. The platform for the virtual Annual Meeting includes functionality that affords authenticated shareholders comparable meeting participation rights and opportunities as they would have at an in-person meeting. Instructions to access and log-in to the virtual Annual Meeting are provided under “What are the procedures for attending and participating in the virtual Annual Meeting?” on page 56 in the accompanying proxy statement.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Michael R. Herman
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Dated: March 18, 202220, 2024
20222024 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION:
| DATE: | ||
| TIME: | 8:00 A.M., Eastern Time | |
The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual-only format and will be available via live webcastexclusively online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022REG2024.
To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. For further information on your participation in the virtual Annual Meeting, please refer to the “Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting” on page 53.
HOW TO VOTE:
Your vote is important. You are eligible to vote if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 10, 2022.8, 2024.
HOW TO VOTE:
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares before the meeting to ensure they are counted. Shareholders of record have until 11:59 P.M, Eastern Time on April 30, 2024 to vote.
 | BY INTERNET PRIOR TO MEETING www.proxyvote.com | |
BY INTERNET DURING MEETING www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ | ||
 | BY PHONE PRIOR TO MEETING Call 1.800.690.6903
| |
 | BY MAIL PRIOR TO MEETING Complete, sign and return | |
OnTo vote or about March 18, 2022, we will mail to our shareholders of recordparticipate in the virtual meeting, you must have the control number that appears on March 10, 2022 who have not previously requested to receive these materials by mail or e-mail ayour Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials which contains instructionsor proxy card.
Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting on how to accessMay 1, 2024 and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. We expect that this proxy statement and our annual reportform of proxy will be mailed and vote online. The Notice instructs you asmade available to how you may access and review allshareholders beginning on or about March 20, 2024.
Important notice regarding the availability of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The Notice also instructs you how to submit your proxy on the Internet or by telephone. If you received the Notice by mail, you will not automatically receive a printed copy of our proxy materials or annual report unless you followfor the instructionsAnnual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday, May 1, 2024: The Proxy Statement for requesting these materials included in the Notice.2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at: https://investors.regencycenters.com.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |i
| Table of Contents
| i | ||||
| 1 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 23 | ||||
| 24 | ||||
| 25 | |||
| 25 | ||||
| 26 | ||||
| 26 | ||||
| 28 | ||||
| 28 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 37 | ||||
| 37 | ||||
| 37 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 38 | ||||
| 39 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 43 | ||||
| 43 | ||||
| 44 | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 51 | ||||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
Shareholder Proposals and Communications with the Board of Directors | ||||
Appendix A — Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures | A-1 | |||
ii| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Table of Contents |
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this document regarding anticipated financial, business, legal or other outcomes, including business and market conditions, outlook and other similar statements relating to Regency’s future events, developments, or financial or operational performance or results, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “forecast,” “project,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “guidance,” and other similar language. However, the absence of these or similar words or expressions does not mean a statement is not forward-looking. While we believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable when made, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and undue reliance should not be placed on these statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance these expectations will be attained, and it is possible actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are only as of the date they are made, and Regency undertakes no duty to update its forward-looking statements except as required by law.
Our operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those risk factors described in Item 1A of our SEC filings.2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). When considering an investment in our securities, you should carefully read and consider these risks, together with all other information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our other filings with and submissions to the SEC. If any of the events described in the risk factors actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results, as well as the market price of our securities, could be materially adversely affected. Forward-looking statements are only provided as of the date they are made, and Regency undertakes no duty to update its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or developments or otherwise, except as and to the extent required by law.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |iii
|
HereIn this proxy statement, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company,” “Regency Centers,” and “Regency” refer to Regency Centers Corporation. In this proxy summary, we present an overview of information that you will find throughout this proxy statement. As this is only a summary, we strongly encourage you to read the entire proxy statement for more information about these topics prior to voting.
Voting Matters
The following table summarizes the proposals to be voted on prior to or at our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Regency Centers and the Board’s voting recommendations of our Board of Directors (“Board”) with respect to each proposal.
PROPOSAL | BOARD’S VOTING RECOMMENDATION | PAGE REFERENCE | ||||||
Proposal 1: Election of our Board’s 11 | FOR | 8 | ||||||
Proposal 2: Advisory | FOR | 25 | ||||||
Proposal 3: Ratification of | FOR | 52 | ||||||
About Regency Centers
Regency Centers is a preeminent national owner, operator and developer of neighborhood and community shopping centers predominantly located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics. Our portfolio includes thriving properties merchandised with highly productive grocers, restaurants, service providers and best-in-class retailers that connect to their neighborhoods, communities and customers. Operating as a fully integrated real estate company, Regency Centers is a qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) that is self-administered, self-managed and an S&Pa Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index member.
Our Core Values
At Regency Centers, we have lived our valuesCore Values for nearlymore than 60 years by successfully meeting our commitments to our people, our customers, our communities and our shareholders. We hold ourselves to this high standard every day. We believe our exceptional culture will continue to set usRegency apart into the future through our unendingunwavering dedication to these beliefs:
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |1
| Proxy Summary
LONGSTANDING EXCELLENCE IN OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTExcellence in Operational Performance
and Financial Management
Regency Centers has demonstrated superior operational performance and createdcontinues to generate value for our shareholders due tothrough our exceptional operational performance, high-quality portfolio, strong balance sheet, superior asset management and development capabilities, and an exceptionala talented team located across 22more than 20 offices nationwide. Our conservative leverage and disciplined approach to capital allocation allow us to effectively operate, acquire and develop properties throughout the business cycle. During 2021,2023, our teams wereteam was able to pursue and execute on value-add leasing transactions, acquisitionsmerger and acquisition opportunities, and development and redevelopment projects that willto further enhance our high-qualitysector-leading portfolio of over 400480 properties in top trade areas around the country.
20212023 Business Highlights
  | Operational |
| ◾ | Executed |
| ◾ |
| ◾ |
| ◾ |
  |
| ◾ |
| ◾ |
| ◾ |
 |
| Maintained S&P and Moody’s investment grade credit ratings of BBB+ and Baa1, respectively, and in February 2024, Moody’s upgraded the Company’s credit rating to A3 with a stable outlook |
 |
| ◾ |
| ◾ |
| ◾ | Acquired high-quality shopping centers totaling over $60 million |
 | Dividend Growth & Free Cash Flow |
| ◾ | Generated significant free cash flow after dividend and capital expenditures |
| ◾ | Increased our quarterly common stock dividend by 3% in 4Q23 to $0.67 per share |
| ◾ | Dividend CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of |
2020 & 2021(1) On January 18, 2024, the Company and its operating partnership, Regency Centers, L.P., entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, which provides an unsecured revolving credit facility in the amount of $1.5 billion. This new credit agreement terminates in March of 2028.
(2) Adjusted Trailing 12-Month Net Debt-to-Operating EBITDAre(3) calculation includes legacy Regency results for the trailing 12 months as of December 31, 2023 and the annualized contribution from properties acquired in the merger with Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. on August 18, 2023.
(3) See Appendix A for reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
10-Year Total Shareholder Return(1) (2014 – 2023)
Regency Outperformed Peers by 11%52%
2| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proxy Summary |
EXCELLENCE IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCEExcellence in Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Highlights
Our Board and senior management are committed to best-in-class corporate governance. Following are highlightssome of our keymost important governance practices and policies:
Board Structure | ✓ Separate roles of Chairman of the Board (Chairman) and
✓
✓ 9 of 11 nominated directors are independent; Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees each entirely comprised of independent directors
✓ Executive sessions of independent directors held at every regular Board and
✓ Diverse Board with
✓ No familial relationships among Board members
✓ Limits on other board service to prevent “overboarding”
✓ Mandatory director retirement age of 75 years | |
Shareholder | ✓ Annual election of directors
✓ Majority voting for directors
✓ Annual
✓
✓ Shareholders representing
✓ Proxy access: shareholders owning 3% of our common stock for at least 3 years may nominate up to 25% of board members
✓ No “poison pill” in effect | |
Board | ✓ Structured oversight of the Company’s corporate strategy and risk management allocated among full Board and Committees
✓ ✓ Robust Board and ✓ Annual self-assessment of Board and Board committee performance ✓ Ethics and compliance program oversight by Nominating and Governance Committee
✓
✓
✓ Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all directors, officers and employees | |
Executive Compensation | ✓ Annual incentives for
✓ Long-term incentives for NEOs largely based on relative total shareholder return (TSR), to foster alignment with shareholders
✓ Stock ownership policy for directors and senior management
✓ Prohibition of hedging and pledging Company stock by officers and directors
✓ Annual risk assessment of executive compensation programs
✓ Clawback
| |
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |3
| Proxy Summary
Our Board of Directors at a Glance
Below is an overview of some of the key attributes of our eleven nominees tofor election as director at the Board.2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Additional information can be found in the skills matrix, Board diversity matrix and biographies for each Board member under Proposal One: Election of Directors.
|  |
 |  |
|
|
|
|
* Does not include one director who joined the Board as part of the 2017 Equity One merger and resigned shortly thereafter.
4| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proxy Summary |
EXCELLENCE IN CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITYExcellence in Corporate Responsibility
Regency’s values,Core Values, including the critical importance that we place on corporate responsibility,Corporate Responsibility (which we also refer to as ESG), are at the foundation of who we are and what we do. These values drive usWe believe that acting responsibly is strategic to implement leading ESG initiatives throughvalue creation for our corporate responsibility program.investors, the long-term sustainability of our business, the interests of our stakeholders, and the protection of the environment. Our Corporate Responsibility program is built on four pillarspillars—our people, our communities, ethics and governance, and environmental stewardship—and is guided by our focus on three overarching concepts: long-term value creation, Regency’s brand recognition and reputation, and the importance of maintaining our unique culture.culture, and Regency’s brand and reputation.
ESGOur Corporate Responsibility Pillars
Corporate Responsibility Oversight and Alignment with Business Strategy
|  |
Our Four Pillars of Corporate Responsibility
(ESG) strategy, initiatives, and business alignment, and has delegated to our Nominating and Governance Committee oversight of Regency’s ESG program and objectives. Our People: Our people areCorporate Responsibility Committee is comprised of senior leaders from key areas of our business and is tasked with working with management’s Executive Committee (which is made up of the Company’s four most important asset, and we strivesenior officers) to ensure that theyour ESG strategy and near-and long-term objectives are engaged, passionate about their work, connected to their teams, and supported to deliver their best performance. Regency recognizes and values the importance of attracting and retaining talented individuals with different skills, backgrounds and experiences. We strive to maintain a safe and healthy workspace, promote employee well-being, and empower our employees by focusing on their training and education. We continue to advance diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”)embedded throughout our organization by focusingbusiness decisions, processes, and activities for the benefit of our shareholders and key stakeholders important to our business success. Our President and CEO, Lisa Palmer, has ultimate senior management responsibility for our ESG program, through her oversight of our Corporate Responsibility Committee and the leadership of our Executive Committee.
In 2023, the Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee, and our full Board, were briefed regularly on four key areas: Talent, Culture, Marketplaceour Corporate Responsibility (ESG) program and Communities.objectives, including strategic sustainability and employee and community engagement initiatives, performance against metrics and targets, sustainability reporting, and the evolving landscape of ESG expectations and practices among our investors and other stakeholders.
Ethics and Governance: As long-term stewards of our investors’ capital, we are committed to best-in-class corporate governance. To create long-term value for our stakeholders, we place great emphasis on our culture and core values, the integrity and transparency of our reporting practices, and our overall governance structure in respect of oversight and shareholder rights.
| Proxy Summary
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |5
| Proxy SummaryCorporate Responsibility Highlights
Our Communities: Our predominately grocery-anchored neighborhood centers provide many benefits to the communities in which we invest and operate, including significant local economic impacts in the form of capital improvements, jobs and taxes. Our local teams are passionate about supporting and engaging with our communities. They customize and cultivate our centers to create a unique environment to bring our tenants and shoppers together for the best retail experience. Further, philanthropy and giving back are cornerstones of what we do and who Regency is. Charitable contributions are made directly by the Company, and the vast majority of our employees donate their time and money to local non-profits serving their communities.
Environmental Stewardship: We believe sustainability is in the best interest of our investors, tenants, employees and the communities in which we operate, and we strive to integrate sustainable practices throughout our business. We have six strategic priorities focused on sustainable business practices and minimizing our environmental impact:
We believe these six strategic priorities are the right areas of focus to address air pollution, climate change and resource scarcity, and support our business in achieving key strategic objectives in our operations and development projects.
Our Approach to ESGCorporate Responsibility Reporting and Disclosure
With a growing demand for disclosure from manyour shareholders and other stakeholders, including our investors, Regency remains committed to robust ESG-relatedCorporate Responsibility (ESG)-related disclosure that is transparent and systematic. We routinely engage with our investors and ESG rating organizations and investors to better understand their expectations and reflect on their priorities in considering and determining our planning and disclosure. In June 2021,May 2023, we issued our fourthsixth annual Corporate Responsibility Report, and, in January 2022, we issued our second standalone Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Report. Our most recent Corporate Responsibility Report was prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)(“GRI”) standard and aligned with the UNUnited Nations Sustainable Development Goals, (UNSDG), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)(“SASB”) and TCFD frameworks. Additionally, available on our website, is our most recent EEO-1 survey. To access our Corporate Responsibility and TCFD reports,Report, along with our other corporate responsibility reports and policies, including our strategy, goals, quantitative metrics and performance, visit our website at https://www.regencycenters.com/corporate-responsibility.
The content on our website, including our Corporate Responsibility and TCFD reports and other information related to corporate responsibility, is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.
6| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proxy Summary |
EXCELLENCE IN STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENTExcellence in Stakeholder Engagement
Our year-round active engagement with a wide variety ofour stakeholders enablessupports and enhances our success in owning, operating, developingas a preeminent national owner, operator and generating value from our national portfoliodeveloper of predominantly grocery-anchored shopping centers. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, our teams have continued to place a priority on safe and continuous engagement.centers located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics.
Stakeholder Group | Engagement Approach | Topics of Discussion | ||||
|
Shareholders, Bondholders & Lenders |
◾ Transparent information sharing throughout the year via company filings, ◾
◾ In 2023, actively communicated with shareholders representing approximately 74% of our common stock ownership ◾ One-on-one and group meetings, calls, property tours and Regency-hosted events ◾ Interactions facilitated via industry associations and
| ✓Company performance ✓ Strategic goals and ✓ Transparent disclosure ✓ Corporate governance ✓ Corporate Responsibility initiatives | |||
|
Employees |
◾
◾ Goal setting by each employee with their managers ◾ Direct dialogue through employee review meetings, company-wide town hall meetings and ◾ Employee task forces and focus groups on Corporate Responsibility initiatives and actions, including employee resource groups ◾ Formal third-party reporting mechanisms to raise any | ✓ Employee engagement, productivity, health and ✓ Corporate Responsibility initiatives ✓ Benefits and ✓ Career development and training | |||
|
Partners |
◾ Dedicated ◾ Proactive and regular one-on-one dialogue ◾ Property tours, monthly financial calls and quarterly |
✓Property and joint venture performance and | |||
|
Tenants |
◾ Extensive tenant resources ◾ Website with best-in-class marketing resources for the ◾
◾ Targeted application of our Merchandising, Placemaking and Connecting strategies and initiatives across all properties and on a tenant-by-tenant basis |
✓Tenant ✓ Property maintenance ✓ Improving tenant flexibility and ✓ Health and ✓ Sustainable building practices | |||
|
Communities | ◾ One-on-onedialogue with local and regional planning agencies, municipal boards, permitting authorities and community groups ◾ Direct dialogue through open houses and town halls ◾ |
✓Project-specific ✓ Community interests and ✓ Curated merchandising and | |||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |7
| Proposal One: Election Of Directors
Proposal One: Election Of Directors
Our Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provide for the number of directors to be fixed pursuant to our bylaws, subject to a minimum of three and a maximum of fifteen. As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board has twelveeleven directors. All nominees were elected as directors by our shareholders at the 2021 annual meeting with the exception of James H. Simmons, III, who was added to the Board after the 2021 annual meeting. Joseph F. Azrack will not stand for re-election this year, as he will have reached the mandatory retirement age of 75 pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines; all other directors have been nominated to stand for re-election at the 2022 annual meeting. The Board will consist ofCompany’s 2023 Annual Meeting. All eleven directors after the 2022 annual meeting. All directors elected at the meetingour 2024 Annual Meeting will serve until the 2023 annual meetingour 2025 Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified.
The accompanying proxy card will be voted for the election of each of the Board’s eleven nominees, unless a shareholder directsit includes instructions otherwise. Each nominee is presently availablehas consented to stand for election. If any nominee should become unavailable, which iswe do not currently anticipated, the persons voting the accompanying proxyanticipate, proxies instructing a vote for that nominee may votebe voted for a substitute nominee designatedselected by our Board of Directors or, alternatively, our Board may determine to leave the vacancy temporarily unfilled or reduce the size of the Board and number of nominees.directors in accordance with our bylaws.
Information about each of the nominees, including biographies, is set forth below and on the following pages.
|
You are being asked to vote on the election of the eleven director nominees listed below. Directors are elected by a majority of votes cast. Each nominee ishas been determined to be independent, in accordance with applicable Nasdaq Stock Market listing requirements, except for Mr. Stein (Executive Chairman) and Ms. Palmer (President and CEO). Upon election of these Directorsdirectors at the Annual Meeting, the Directorsdirectors shall hold the Board committee memberships and chair positions as follows:
Committee Membership
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Committee Membership
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Primary Occupation | Age | Director Since | Audit | Compensation | Nominating and Governance | Investment | Age | Director Since | Audit | Compensation | Nominating and Governance | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair Chairman of PulteGroup, Inc. and Principal of Harborview Associates, LLC |
| 63 |
| 2014 | 🌑 | ¶ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair Principal of Harborview Associates, LLC |
| 65 | 2014 | 🌑 | ¶ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship Lead Director of the Board and Director of Civeo Corporation |
| 72 |
| 2001 | 🌑 | 🌑 |
| 74 | 2001 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens Executive Vice President and General Manager, IT Asset Lifecycle Management of Iron Mountain |
| 58 |
| 2018 | 🌑 | ¶ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell Recently Retired Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief ESG Officer of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. |
| 62 | 2023 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens Recently Retired Executive Vice President and General Manager, IT Asset Lifecycle Management of Iron Mountain |
| 60 | 2018 | 🌑 | ¶ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Consumer Equity Partners |
| 55 |
| 2019 | 🌑 | 🌑 |
| 57 | 2019 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein Founding Partner of Bloomberg Beta |
| 50 |
| 2019 | 🌑 | 🌑 |
| 52 | 2019 | ¶ | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman Principal of Linneman Associates |
| 70 |
| 2017 | 🌑 | 🌑 |
| 72 | 2017 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor Managing Partner of High Rise Capital Partners, LLC |
| 57 |
| 2011 | 🌑 | ¶ |
| 59 | 2011 | 🌑 | ¶ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation |
| 54 |
| 2018 | 🌑 |
| 56 | 2018 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III Chief Executive Officer and Founding Partner of Asland Capital Partners |
| 55 |
| 2021 | 🌑 | 🌑 |
| 57 | 2021 | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board and Former Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation |
| 69 |
| 1993 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles Former Chairman of DCT Industrial Trust |
| 70 |
| 2001 | ¶ | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board and Retired Chief Executive Officer of Regency Centers Corporation |
| 71 | 1993 | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
🌑 Member ¶ Committee Chair 
Audit Committee Financial Expert
8| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal One: Election Of Directors |
Director NomineesNominee Qualifications
The following skills matrix and biographies of our nominees contain information regarding each person’s qualifications, experience, self-identification, other director positions held currently or at any time during at least the last five years and information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable. The biographies also reflect the Board committee memberships the nominees will hold upon their election. In addition, a Board Diversity Matrix can be found on page 18.17. We believe that each nominee possesses the core competencies that are expected of all of our directors, namely, independence (except for Mr. Stein and Ms. Palmer), integrity, sound business judgment and athe ability and willingness to represent the long-term interests of our shareholders.
SKILLS/EXPERIENCE |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS/STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP “C Suite” experience (CEO, CFO, COO or similar) or sub “C Suite” experience as division president or functional leader within a substantial organization. |  | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
REAL ESTATE/REIT Experience in a significant organization where the ownership, operation and development of real estate is integral to the business; or knowledge and experience in issues facing real estate investment trusts. |  | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL MARKETS/INVESTMENTS Experience in equity, debt and capital markets, generally. | | | |  | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSUMER RETAIL Experience in a consumer driven or technology related retailer. | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE/ Experience serving as a public company director (other than Regency Centers) and demonstrated understanding of corporate governance standards and practices in public companies. | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FINANCIAL/ACCOUNTING* Experience as a public company senior leader with significant financial responsibilities (e.g. CEO or CFO) or able to qualify as an Audit Committee Financial Expert under SEC rules. | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
HUMAN CAPITAL Experience managing a large and diverse workforce with involvement in benefits, compensation and incentive planning, including Board and management succession planning. | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TECHNOLOGY/CYBER Significant experience with or oversight of innovation, technology, information systems and data management. | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All of our directors are “financially literate” as defined by SEC rules.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |9
| Proposal One: Election Of Directors
 | Bryce Blair
Age: Director Since: 2014 |
Professional Experience:
Mr. Blair, a graduate of the University of New Hampshire, holds an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Mr. Blair serves as the principal of Harborview Associates, LLC, which holds and manages investments in various real estate properties. He serves as Chairmana director of PulteGroup, Inc., one of the largest home builders in the U.S., andin which he served as Chairman from 2017 until December 31, 2022. He is a member of the Advisory Board of Navitas Capital, a venture capital firm focused on technology for the real estate sector. Mr. Blair serves as the principal of Harborview Associates, LLC, which holds and manages investments in various real estate properties. Mr. Blair served as Chairman, from 2017 to 2021, and director, from 2013 to 2021, of Invitation Homes, Inc. He has served as Chairman, from 2002 to 2013, and Chief Executive Officer, from 2001 to 2012, of AvalonBay Communities, Inc., a real estate investment trust focused on the development, acquisition and management of multi-family apartments. Mr. Blair also serves on the Advisory Board of the Boston College Center for Real Estate and Urban Action and the Advisory Board of Home Start, a non-profit focused on ending homelessness in the greater Boston area. He previously served on the Advisory Board of the MIT Center for Real Estate. Prior to the formation of Avalon Properties in 1993, Mr. Blair was a partner with Trammell Crow Residential. Mr. Blair also previously served as senior advisor to McKinsey and Co. and previously served as a part time faculty member at Boston College. Mr. Blair is a past Chairman of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”)(Nareit), where he also served on the Executive Committee and the Board of Governors. He is a past member of ULIUrban Land Institute (ULI) where he served as a Trustee and was past Chairman of the Multi-Family Council. Mr. Blair is a past member of the Young Presidents Organization and a former member of the World Presidents Organization.
Board Committees ◾ Nominating and Governance ◾ Investment (Chair)
Other public company boards ◾ PulteGroup, Inc.
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾
Qualifications Extensive experience in real estate operations, development and investment. Strong background in corporate strategy and corporate governance.
| |||
 | C. Ronald Blankenship Independent Lead Director
Age: Director Since: 2001 |
Professional Experience:
Mr. Blankenship, a graduate of the University of Texas, is a certified public accountant. Mr. Blankenship served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Verde Realty infrom January 2009 and assumed the additional role of its Chairman from January 2012 to December 2012.2012 until August 2013. Prior to 2009, he served in various executive and director capacities at Security Capital Group and Archstone Communities Trust. While he was with Security Capital Group, it held controlling interests in eighteen public and private real estate operating companies, eight of which were listed on the NYSE. Prior to joining Security Capital, Mr. Blankenship was a regional partner at Trammell Crow Residential and was on the management Board for Trammell Crow Residential Services. Before Trammell Crow, Mr. Blankenship was the Chief Financial Officer and President of office development for Mischer Corporation, a Houston-based real estate development company. He serves as a director of Civeo Corporation, a provider of work-force accommodations. He formerly served as trustee of Prologis Trust and director of Archstone Communities Trust, BelmontCorp, InterPark Holdings Incorporated, Storage USA, Inc., CarrAmerica Realty Corporation and Macquarie Capital Partners, LLC. Mr. Blankenship serves as a director of Pacolet-Miliken Enterprises, Inc., a private investment company, Berkshire Residential Investments, a private real estate investment management company, and Merit Hill Holdings, LP, a privately held owner and operator of self-storage facilities. While he was with Security Capital Group, Security Capital Group had controlling interests in eighteen public and private real estate operating companies, eight of which were listed on the NYSE. Prior to joining Security Capital, Mr. Blankenship was a regional partner at Trammell Crow Residential and was on the management Board for Trammell Crow Residential Services. Before Trammell Crow, Mr. Blankenship was the Chief Financial Officer and President of office development for Mischer Corporation, a Houston-based real estate development company.
Board Committees ◾ Audit ◾ Investment
Other public company boards ◾ Civeo Corporation
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Verde Realty
Qualifications Extensive background in real estate development, acquisitions, financing and operations. Extensive experience in public company governance, the REIT industry, strategic planning, capital allocation, human capital management and executive compensation.
| |||
10| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal One: Election Of Directors |
| Kristin A. Campbell Age: 62 Director Since: 2023 |
Professional Experience:
Ms. Campbell, a graduate of Arizona State University, holds a J.D. from Cornell Law School. She serves as Senior Advisor at BarkerGilmore, a national legal executive search and leadership consulting firm. She served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief ESG Officer of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., a global hospitality company from June 2011 until her retirement in October 2023.She led Hilton’s global legal, compliance, government affairs and ESG functions. Prior to Hilton, Ms. Campbell was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Staples, Inc. from 2007 to 2011, with an overall tenure of 18 years at Staples. Prior to Staples, she worked at several law firms, including Goodwin Proctor and Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster. Ms. Campbell has served as director of The ODP Corporation since 2016. She is a member of the Advisory Board of each of Boston University School of Hospitality Administration and LegalMation. Ms. Campbell serves on the board of Crete Mechanical Group, a private national multi-service building solution provider. She previously served on the Advisory Board of New Perimeter.
Board Committees ◾ Compensation ◾ Nominating and Governance Other public company boards ◾ The ODP Corporation | ||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Recently Retired Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief ESG Officer of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. Qualifications Extensive background in legal, compliance, ESG, retail, public company board and governance, real estate and M&A. | ||
 | Deirdre J. Evens
Age: Director Since: 2018 |
Professional Experience:
Ms. Evens, a graduate of Cornell University, currently servesserved as Executive Vice President and General Manager, IT Asset Lifecycle Management of Iron Mountain.Mountain, Inc.from January 2022 until her retirement in December 2023. Prior to that, she served as Executive Vice President and General Manager, North America, Records and Information Management of Iron Mountain.Mountain from July 2018 to January 2022. Prior to that, she served as its Chief of Operations from January 2018 to June 30, 2018 and as its Chief People Officer and Executive Vice President from July 21, 2015 to January 2018. Prior to her service with Iron Mountain, Ms. Evens served as an Executive Vice President of human resources at Clean Harbors, Inc. from 2011 to July 2015, overseeing all aspects of human resources and employee development for a global workforce of more than 13,000 employees. From 2007 to 2011, Ms. Evens served as Executive Vice President of corporate salesCorporate Sales & marketingMarketing for Clean Harbors. Prior to her service with Clean Harbors, Ms. Evens served as Senior Vice President of member insightMember Insight at BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. from 2006 to 2007 and held a series of positions of increasing responsibility at Polaroid Corporation from 1986 to 2006, including her role as Senior Vice President of strategy.Strategy.
Board Committees ◾ Audit ◾ Compensation (Chair)
Other public company boards ◾ None
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Recently Retired Executive Vice President and General Manager, IT Asset Lifecycle Management of Iron Mountain
Qualifications
| |||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |11
| Proposal One: Election Of Directors
 | Thomas W. Furphy
Age: Director Since: 2019 |
Professional Experience:
Mr. Furphy, a graduate of Hartwick College, currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Consumer Equity Partners, a venture capital and venture development firm. He also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Replenium, Inc., a private e-commerce software company. PriorSince July 2023, Mr. Furphy has served as a Luminary (senior advisor) to Accenture, a Dublin company that specializes in information technology services and consulting. Previously, Mr. Furphy served as Vice President of Consumables and AmazonFresh at AmazonAmazon.com, Inc. from 2005 to 2009, where he was responsible for the underlying strategy, development and execution of the company’s grocery and health and beauty businesses. Prior to Amazon, Mr. Furphy was the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Notiva, a leading provider of web-based trade settlement software for retailers and their trading partners. Prior to Notiva, from 1991 to 1999, he held various senior management roles at Wegmans Food Markets.Markets, Inc. Mr. Furphy also servespreviously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ideoclick, Inc., a full servicefull-service ecommerce private agency. He also previously served as a board member of BevyUp, a private digital retail-selling platform, which was acquired by Nordstrom in March 2018. He previously served as a board member of Fairway Group Holdings Corp., a private parent company of Fairway Market, a grocery store operator.
Board Committees ◾ Audit ◾
Other public company boards ◾ None
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Consumer Equity Partners
Qualifications Extensive experience in retail, addressing technological change, cyber issues, marketing, finance and leadership.
| |||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |11
| Proposal One: Election Of Directors
 | Karin M. Klein
Age: Director Since: 2019 |
Professional Experience:
Ms. Klein, a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, holds an M.B.A from the Wharton School of University of Pennsylvania. She serves as the founding partner of Bloomberg Beta, a venture capital firm which invests in technology companies that help businesses work smarter, with a focus on machine intelligence, since 2013. Prior to launching Bloomberg Beta, Ms. Klein was responsible for strategy and business development for Bloomberg L.P. from 2010 to 2013 including serving as head of new initiatives. Prior to Bloomberg, from 2000 to 2010, Ms. Klein served in various roles at Softbank Corp., a multinational telecommunications and technology company, including the role of directorDirector of corporate development.Corporate Development. Before Softbank, she also held investing and operating roles at several investment companies and co-founded a children’s education business. She serves as a director of Paramount Group, Inc., and formerly served as a member of the Board of Trustees of Harvey Mudd College.
Board Committees ◾ Audit (Chair) ◾ Nominating and Governance
Other public company boards ◾ Paramount Group, Inc.
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Founding Partner of Bloomberg Beta
Qualifications Extensive experience in media, addressing technological change, cyber issues, investments, finance, accounting, strategy and leadership.
| |||
12| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal One: Election Of Directors |
 | Peter D. Linneman
Age: Director Since: 2017 |
Professional Experience:
Dr. Linneman holds both an M.A. and a doctorate degree in economics from the University of Chicago. He served on the Board of Equity One, Inc. from 2000 until its merger with usRegency in 2017. Dr. Linneman is currently a principal of Linneman Associates, a real estate advisory firm, and affiliated entities. From 1979 to 2011, Dr. Linneman was a Professor of Real Estate, Finance and Public Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of BusinessUniversity of Pennsylvania and is currently an Emeritus Albert Sussman Professor of Real Estate. He serves as an independent director of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., Paramount Group, Inc., and Equity Commonwealth. Dr. Linneman served as a director of Bedford Property Investors, Inc., Atrium European Real Estate Ltd. and JER Investors Trust, Inc., a finance company that acquires real estate debt securities and loans. He was also Chairman of Rockefeller Center Properties.Properties Inc.
Board Committees ◾ Audit ◾ Nominating and Governance
Other public company boards ◾ AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. ◾ Paramount Group, Inc. ◾ Equity Commonwealth
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Principal of Linneman Associates and affiliated entities
Qualifications Extensive experience in financial and business advisory services and investment
| |||
12| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal One: Election Of Directors |
 | David P. O’Connor
Age: Director Since: 2011 |
Professional Experience:
Mr. O’Connor, a graduate of the Carroll School of Management at Boston College, holds an M.S. degree in real estate from New York University. Mr. O’Connor serves as managing partner of High Rise Capital Partners, LLC and non-executive Co-Chairman of HighBrook Investment Management, LP, a real estate private equity firm. He was the co-founder and senior managing partner of High Rise Capital Management, L.P., a real estate securities hedge fund manager which managed several funds from 2001 to 2011. Mr. O’Connor serves as director of Prologis, Inc., a global leader in industrial real estate, and served as director of Paramount Group, Inc., an owner-operator and manager of high-quality office properties from November 2014 to June 2018. From 1994 to 2000, he was principal, co-portfolio manager and Investment Committee member of European Investors, Inc., a large dedicated REIT investor. He serves on the Board of Trustees of Boston College, the Investment Committees of endowments for Boston College and Columbia University (Teacher’s College) and serves on the Executive Committee of the Zell/Lurie Real Estate Center at the Wharton School of University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.Pennsylvania. Mr. O’Connor also serves as a national trustee of PGA REACH, the charitable foundation of the PGA of America. He is a frequent speaker at REIT investment forums and conferences and has served as an adjunct instructor of real estate at New York University.
Board Committees ◾ Compensation ◾ Nominating and Governance (Chair)
Other public company boards ◾ Prologis, Inc.
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Managing Partner of High Rise Capital Partners, LLC and Non-Executive Co-Chairman of HighBrook Investment Management, LP
Qualifications Extensive experience as a successful real estate securities investor, as well as hedge fund manager. Strong background and experience in real estate securities and capital markets.
| |||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |13
| Proposal One: Election Of Directors
 | Lisa Palmer
Age: Director Since: 2018 |
Professional Experience:
Ms. Palmer, a graduate of the University of Virginia, holds an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Palmer became our Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2020, and has served as our President since January 1, 2016 to date. Previously, she served as our Chief Financial Officer from January 2013 to August 12, 2019. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President of capital marketsCapital Markets from 2003 until 2013. She served as senior managerSenior Manager of investment servicesInvestment Services in 1996 and assumed the role of Vice President of capital marketsCapital Markets in 1999. Prior to joining our Company, Ms. Palmer worked with Accenture plc, formerly Andersen Consulting Strategic Services, as a consultant and financial analyst for General Electric.Electric Company. She serves as a director of the Jacksonville Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and Brooks Rehabilitation, a private healthcare organization. She is also a board membercurrently serves as Chair of United Way of Northeast Florida, an executive board member of Nareit, a member of ULI, and a member of the International CouncilBoard of Shopping Centers (“ICSC”)Trustee of Innovating Commerce Serving Communities (ICSC). She previously served as a director of ESH Hospitality, Inc., a subsidiary of Extended Stay America, Inc.
Board Committees ◾ Investment
Other public company boards ◾ None
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Our Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2020 and President since January 1, 2016
Qualifications Extensive knowledge of the shopping center and real estate industries along with finance and capital markets, operations, public board strategy and governance.
| |||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |13
| Proposal One: Election Of Directors
 | James H. Simmons, III
Age: Director Since: 2021 |
Professional Experience:
Mr. Simmons, a graduate of Princeton University, holds an M.S. from Virginia Tech and an M.B.A. from Northwestern University. Mr. Simmons currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Founding Partner of Asland Capital Partners, an institutional investment management platform, serving as head of the investment committee with responsibility for the strategic direction and investment strategy of the firm. Prior to Asland, Mr. Simmons served as a Partner at Ares Management Corporation, a global alternative investment manager, from 2013 to 2018. He also served as a Partner at Apollo Real Estate Advisors L.P. from 2002 to 2013. Prior to Apollo, Mr. Simmons served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of the Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone Development Corporation. He also haspreviously served as a director of Apollo Strategic Growth Capital (NYSE: APSG) since 2020, and. He is currently serves asa member of Princeton University National Annual Giving Committee, a member of the Princeton University President’s Advisory Council, vice-chair of the Real Estate Executive Council, and as a director of the Greater Jamaica Development Corporation.
Board Committees ◾ Compensation ◾ Investment
Other public company boards ◾
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾ Chief Executive Officer and Founding Partner of Asland Capital Partners
Qualifications Extensive knowledge of and experience in real estate development, transactions and operations. Strong experience in finance, marketing, strategy and leadership.
| |||
14| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal One: Election Of Directors |
 | Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman
Age: Director Since: 1993 |
Professional Experience:
Mr. Stein, a graduate of Washington and Lee University, holds an M.B.A. from Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business. Mr. Stein has been our Executive Chairman of the Board since January 1, 2020, having served as a director of the Board since 1993 and its Chairman since 1998. Mr. Stein served as Chief Executive Officer from our initial public offering in 1993 until December 31, 2019. He was our President and Chief Executive Officer from 1993 until 1998 and presidentPresident of our predecessor real estate division beginning in 1981 and Vice President from 1976 to 1981. He is a director of FRP Holdings, Inc., a publicly held real estate company. He served as past Chairman of Nareit, and is a member of ULI, ICSC and the Real Estate Roundtable. Mr. Stein is a former trustee of Washington and Lee University and ULI.
Board Committees ◾ Investment
Other public company boards ◾ FRP Holdings, Inc.
| |||
Principal occupation or employment ◾
Qualifications Extensive experience in real estate development, acquisitions, financing and operations. Strong knowledge of the REIT industry, strategic planning, capital allocation, people management and executive compensation.
| |||
14| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal One: Election Of Directors |
 |
|
Professional Experience:
Mr. Wattles, a graduate of Stanford University, holds an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He consults for a private equity firm that specializes in real estate. Mr. Wattles serves as a director of Advance Real Estate, a privately held industrial real estate company in Mexico City and Delin Property, a European industrial real estate company. Mr. Wattles served as a director of Columbia Property Trust from 2013 to 2021. Mr. Wattles served as Executive Chairman of DCT Industrial Trust, a publicly held industrial property REIT, from 2003 to May 2016, and then served as Chairman Emeritus from May 2016 to August 2018. Mr. Wattles was a principal of both Black Creek Group and Dividend Capital Group LLC, each a real estate investment management firm, from 2003 to 2008. He served as Chief Investment Officer of Security Capital Group from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Wattles was managing director, then Co-Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis, Inc. from 1992 to 1997. Mr. Wattles has previously served as a director of Prologis, Inc., Interpark Holdings Incorporated and Security Capital European Realty. At Security Capital Group, he oversaw capital deployment and investments in multiple public and private operating platforms with focus on retail, industrial, parking, manufactured housing and European office sectors. While Mr. Wattles was with Security Capital Group, Security Capital Group had controlling interests in eighteen public and private real estate operating companies, eight of which were listed on the NYSE.
| ||
| ||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |15
| Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our Board has adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines (“CGGs”)(CGGs), which describe the Board’s responsibility for oversight of the business and affairs of the Company as well as guidelines for determining director independence and consideration of potential nominees to the Board. Our CGGs are found on the Company’s website at www.regencycenters.com.https://investors.regencycenters.com. Our Board, directly and through its Nominating and Governance Committee, regularly reviews developments and best practices in corporate governance and makes modification to the CGGs, committee charters and other key governance documents, policies and practices as it determines necessary or desirable.appropriate.
Our Board of Directors has determined that nine of its eleven nominated directorsnominees for director (Bryce Blair, C. Ronald Blankenship, Kristin A. Campbell, Deirdre J. Evens, Thomas W. Furphy, Karin M. Klein, Peter D. Linneman, David P. O’Connor, and James H. Simmons, III and Thomas G. Wattles)III), or 82%, are “independent” as defined by applicable Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards.requirements. The Board annually reviews all commercial, familial and charitable relationships of directors and determines whether directors meet these applicable independence tests. To assist in making these determinations, the Board has adopted a set of independence standards, which are set forth in the Company’s CGGs, which meet or exceed the Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards.requirements.
The roles of Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently separate. Our Board does not have a formal policy on whether the same person should serve in both roles at the same time and believes that it shouldis prudent to have the flexibility to periodically review and determine the leadership structure that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
Since January 1, 2020, Mr. Stein has served as Executive Chairman of the Board given his extensive history with the Company and vast knowledge of the real estate industry. Ms. Palmer serves as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board. Pursuant to the CGGs, if the Chairman is also an employee of the Company (as Mr. Stein is, as Executive Chairman), the Board shall elect an independent Lead Director. Mr. Blankenship was appointedfirst elected Lead Director in 2019.2019 and has been re-elected unanimously by the Board each year since then.
Role of Independent Lead Director
The independent Lead Director serves as the principal liaison between the Executive Chairman of the Board and the independent directors, presides at the executive sessions of independent directors at each Board meeting and other meetings of independent directors, helps lead the annual performance evaluation of the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, and performs such other duties as may be assigned or requested by the Board. Both the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer consult routinely with the independent Lead Director on board agendas, substantive board issues and on strategic and significant business issues facing the Company.
See “Shareholder Proposals and Communications with the Board of Directors” for information on how to communicate with Mr. Blankenship or any of the other independent directors. |
|
16| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Corporate Governance |
Meetings of Board of Directors
Our Board held five regular meetings during 2023. All directors attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and Board committees on which they served during 2023.
|
|
Directors are encouraged to attend each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. However, we do not have a formal policy requiring their attendance. Each of our current directors (who comprise all of the current nominees) were present during the 2023 Annual Meeting.
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
The independent directors hold regularly scheduled executive sessions of the Board and its committees without senior management (noror the non-independent directors) directors present. These executive sessions are chaired by the independent Lead Director (at Board meetings) or by the committee chairs (at committee meetings), alleach of whom are independent directors. The independent directors met in executive session at all of the regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings held in 2021.2023.
The Nominating and Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in establishing criteria and qualifications for potential Board members. The committee identifies individuals who meet such criteria and qualifications to become Board members and recommends to the Board such individuals as potential nominees for election to the Board.
In addition, after consideration of the skills matrix set forth on page 9, diversity matrix on page 18below and other considerations in respect of the potential needs of the Board, the committee seeks competencies, attributes, skills and experience that will complement and enhance the Board’s existing make-up, while taking into account expected retirements, to best facilitate Board succession, transition and effectiveness. The committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, to recommend a group that can best continuecontribute to the success of our Company.
Directors may not be nominated or stand for re-election after reaching age 75, unless the Board elects to waive this limitation.
Board Diversity Matrix (as of March 20, 2024)*
The table below reflects certain diversity information based on self-identification by each director.
Board Size: | ||||||||
Total Number of Directors | 11 | |||||||
Gender: | Female | Male | Non-Binary | Did not Disclose | ||||
Number of directors based on gender identity | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Demographic Background: | ||||||||
African American or Black | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Alaskan Native or American Indian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hispanic or Latinx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
White | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Two or More Races or Ethnicities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
LGBTQ+ | 0 | |||||||
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background | 1 | |||||||
* To see our Board’s diversity matrix as of March 22, 2023, please see our proxy statement filed with the SEC on March 22, 2023.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |17
| Corporate Governance
Succession Planning, Board Refreshment and Diversity
The mix of skills, experiences, backgrounds, tenures and competencies, as well as the continuity of our Board, hashave been integral over time to the success of our Company. To ensure that this mix is maintained and enhanced, our Board has established a succession planning process. After initially adopting a formal succession plan in 2014, this plan has since been revisited and revised multiple times by the Board. A review of the Board succession plan is part of the annual agendaagendas of both the Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board.
Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the specific personal and professional attributes of each director candidate versus those of existing Board members to ensure diversity of competencies, experience, personal history and background, thought, skills and expertise across the full Board. While our Nominating and Governance Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy in connection with the evaluation of director candidates or the selection of nominees, active and intentional consideration is also given to diversity in terms of gender, ethnic background, age and other similar attributes that could contribute to Board perspective and effectiveness. Our Board currently has threefour female directors (36%), and in 2021, theone ethnically diverse director, for an aggregate representation of diversity on our Board appointed James H. Simmons, III to our Board. In addition to his extensive qualifications and experience in the real estate industry, Mr. Simmons brings ethnic diversity to the Board.of approximately 45%.
The committeeNominating and Governance Committee also continually assesses diversity through its annual succession plan review, annual evaluation of Board structure and composition, and annual Board and committee performance self-assessment process. The committee and the Board believe that fostering Board diversity best serves the needs of the Company and the interests of its shareholders, and it is one of the key factors considered when identifying individuals for Board membership. We believe that diversity with respect to competencies, thought, gender, ethnicity, tenure, experience and expertise is important to provide both fresh perspectives and deep experience and knowledge of the Company.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |17
| Corporate Governance
Over the past several years, the Board has significantly refreshed itself, reflecting a balanced and diverse group of skilled, experienced directors with varied perspectives and backgrounds, as reflected on the skills matrix, diversity matrix and nominee biographies. The Board’s 2021 succession plan reflects the same objectives. Accomplishments of the Board’s succession planning process since 2015 include:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Board Diversity Matrix (as of March 18, 2022)
Board Size: | ||||||||
Total Number of Directors | 12 | |||||||
Gender: | Female | Male | Non-Binary | Gender Undisclosed | ||||
Number of directors based on gender identity | 3 | 8 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Demographic Background: | ||||||||
African American or Black | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Alaskan Native or American Indian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Hispanic or Latinx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
White | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Two or More Races or Ethnicities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
LGBTQ+ | 0 | |||||||
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background | 1 | |||||||
18| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Corporate Governance |
Director Nominee Selection Process
Our Nominating and Governance Committee solicits input regarding potential candidates from a variety of sources, including existing directors, senior management and shareholders. From time to time, we have used an executive search firm, especially when helpful in identifying new or different pools of talent for our Board. For example, in 2021, theour Board engaged an executive search firm in each of 2021 and 2022 to assist usour Company in the successful recruitment of atwo highly experienced ethnicallyand diverse candidatecandidates for our Board, which led to the appointment of Mr. Simmons.Simmons and Ms. Campbell, respectively. Through these and other means, the Board has continually refreshed itself by selecting directors who will be additive to the overall mix of talent, experience and expertise on the Board. The committee evaluates potential candidates based on a variety of factors and also arranges personal interviews by one or more committee members, other Board members and senior management, where appropriate.
18| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Corporate Governance |
Director Candidate Nominations through Proxy Access
Our bylaws make proxy access available to our shareholders. Under this process, a shareholder or group of up to 20 shareholders of common stock who have owned shares of our common stock equal to at least 3% of the aggregate of our issued and outstanding common shares continuously for at least three years may seek to include director nominees in our proxy materials at our Annual Meeting. The maximum number of director nominees that may be submitted pursuant to these provisions may not exceed 25% of the number of directors then on the Board, with such number willto be reduced by the number of individuals that the Board nominates for re-election who were previously elected based upon a nomination pursuant to proxy access or other shareholder nomination or proposal. To be eligible to use proxy access, such shareholders must satisfy other eligibility, procedure and disclosure requirements set forth in our bylaws.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |19
| Corporate Governance
Our Board does not allow “overboarding”, which refers to a director serving on an excessive number of public company boards. Excessive board commitments can lead to a director being unable to devote sufficient attention to Board matters and appropriately fulfill his or her duties to the Company and its shareholders. Our CGGs limit the number of boards on which our directors and officers can serve, and further provide that no more than two active Regency executives may serve on our Board at any time. Our CGGs provide for the following limitations:
Position | Maximum Public | ||||||
Independent director holding full-time executive position with another company | 2 | ||||||
Independent director who is not a full-time executive | 4 | ||||||
Regency officer | 2** | ||||||
* Maximum number includes service on Regency’s Board.
** Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in our CGGs, no Regency officer may serve on more than one outside public company Board unless a specific exception is made by the Board.
Board Self-Assessment and Evaluation
Annual self-evaluation and assessment of Board performance helps ensure that theour Board and its committees function effectively and in the best interest of our shareholders. This process also promotes good governance and helps set expectations about the relationship and interaction of and between theour Board and management. TheOur Board’s annual self-evaluation and assessment process, which is overseen by our independent Lead Director and Chair of our Nominating and Governance Committee, is re-evaluatedreviewed and reconsidered annually and is currently structured and carried out as follows:
20|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|19
|Corporate Governance|
Our Board actively oversees material risks that could impact the Company. This oversight is conducted both directly by management and through committees of the Board. TheBoard committees. Our Board satisfies its responsibility through receiving reports by each committee chair after each meeting regarding the applicable committee’s considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers and management level committees responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company. Management committees frequently work jointly on issues with overlapping subject matter.
|
Oversees the Company’s most significant risks and ensures that management
|
Board Committees
AUDIT
|
COMPENSATION
|
NOMINATING AND
|
INVESTMENT
| |||||||||
◾ Has primary responsibility for overseeing financial statements integrity and financial risk for the Company.
◾ Oversees cybersecurity risk. | ◾ Oversees risk associated with our executive compensation programs, policies and practices. | ◾ Oversees
◾ Oversees
◾ Oversees
◾ Oversees
| ◾ Oversees risks associated with capital allocation.
◾ Oversees risks associated with real estate investments, developments and redevelopments. |
Management Committees
|
◾ Currently consists of our
◾
◾ Provides quarterly updates to the full Board and/or appropriate Board committee, either directly or through its management committees, concerning the strategic, operational and emerging risks to the Company’s ability to achieve its
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Oversees real estate portfolio and investment risk. | Oversees corporate enterprise and operational risk. |
| BUSINESS CONTINUITY | CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
| CYBER RISK | COMPLIANCE |
DISCLOSURE
| ||||||||||||
Develops and executes strategies
| Assesses ESG-related risks and leads the initiatives of the Company’s corporate responsibility program. | Assesses and mitigates the risks posed by cybersecurity incidents and cyber-attacks impacting the Company’s data and information systems. | Oversees risk associated with the Company’s ethics and compliance program. | Assesses and mitigates risk associated with the Company’s financial controls and disclosures. |
20|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|21
|Corporate Governance|
Our Board of Directors has established four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee and an Investment Committee, each as described below. Members of these committees are elected annually by our Board of Directors. The charters for each of these committees isare available on our website at www.regencycenters.com.
Audit Committee
| MEMBERS | KEY RESPONSIBILITIES | |||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship*
Deirdre J. Evens*
Thomas
Peter D. Linneman*
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined under the applicable
|
◾ Assists the Board in its oversight of: ◾ the integrity of our financial statements ◾ our accounting and reporting processes and controls ◾ REIT and other tax compliance ◾ derivatives and hedging transactions ◾ our internal audit functions, and ◾ our insurance programs
◾ Reviews the independence and performance of our
◾
◾ Approves the Audit Committee Report as shown on page 51. The report further details the Audit Committee’s responsibilities, and ◾ Oversees the Company’s cybersecurity program and initiatives (see below)
| |||||||||
| ||||||||||
The committee met |
Cybersecurity Governance Highlights
| |||||||||
* Audit Committee Financial Experts: Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an “Audit Committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC. In accordance with our CGGs, no member of the Audit Committee serves on the Audit Committee of more than three public companies. | ✓ Management’s Cyber Risk Committee reports to the Board’s Audit Committee quarterly, including reports on any significant cyber breaches (no such breach in the past five years) ✓ References NIST cybersecurity framework to identify and remediate risk gaps ✓ Robust monitoring of internal and external threats ✓ Validation and testing, including third-party cyber assessments and penetration tests ✓ Review the security protocols of our key vendors ✓ Cyber insurance procured by the Company ✓ Preparation of Cybersecurity Risk Management Policy; modified in 2023 to reflect new SEC requirements | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Compensation Committee
MEMBERS
|
KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
| |||||
Deirdre J. Evens, CHAIR
David P. O’Connor
James H. Simmons, III
The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent
|
◾ Establishes and oversees our executive compensation and benefits programs
◾
◾
◾
◾ | |||||
The committee met
| Note: The committee has retained
| |||||
| ||||||
22|
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|21
|Corporate Governance|
Nominating and Governance Committee
MEMBERS
|
KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
| |||||
David P. O’Connor,
Bryce Blair Kristin A. Campbell
Karin M. Klein
Peter D. Linneman
The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent within the meaning of the Company’s independence standards and applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
|
◾ Establishes sound corporate governance in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and best practices
◾ Oversees the Company’s
◾ Assists our Board in establishing criteria and qualifications for potential Board members
◾ Identifies and recruits high quality individuals to become members of our Board and recommends director nominees to the Board
◾ Leads the Board in its annual assessment of the Board’s performance
◾ Reviews committee membership and recommends nominees for each committee of the Board
◾ Oversees the Company’s ethics and compliance program, and
◾ Oversees the Company’s political activities, including any political spending | |||||
The committee met
| ||||||
| ||||||
Investment Committee
MEMBERS
|
KEY RESPONSIBILITIES
| |||||
Bryce Blair,
C. Ronald Blankenship Thomas W. Furphy
Lisa Palmer
James H. Simmons, III
Martin E. Stein, Jr.
|
◾ Oversees and approves strategy relating to capital allocation and investment for acquisitions, redevelopments and new developments
◾ Approves investment guidelines for management, as well as any changes to such guidelines
◾ Oversees acquisition and disposition strategy and programs, and
◾ Reviews the financial performance of developments, redevelopments and other similar investments | |||||
The committee met
| ||||||
| ||||||
* This Director will assume the role of Chair after the Annual Meeting, assuming re-election to the Board.
Under theour CGGs, theour Board has also established an Executive Committee, to meet when necessary or desirable to handle ministerial matters under applicable law and Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards.requirements. The Executive Committee includes the Executive Chairman and any two other directors who qualify as independent, as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.Market listing requirements. If the Executive Chairman is unavailable, the President and Chief Executive Officer would serve in his place. This committee did not meet in 2021.2023.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |23
| Corporate Governance
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board, of Directors, through delegation to its Nominating and Governance Committee, oversees the substance of and compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics for our directors, officers and employees. It is available on our website at www.regencycenters.com.
Our stock ownership policy is designed to focus our senior officers and directors on long-term shareholder value creation. Our policy sets stock ownership targets for senior officers as a multiple of base salary and for non-employee directors as a multiple of their annual retainer (exclusive of fees for committee service).https://investors.regencycenters.com.
The targets, which are measured based on the Company’s trailing 36-month average common stock price, are to be achieved by directors and senior officers over a maximum five-year period. Our stock ownership policy also requires all covered participants to retain 25% of the shares they receive as direct compensation (on a pre-tax basis) after being hired, promoted or elected into such positions so long as they remain a senior officer or director. With respect to Senior Vice Presidents, the retention requirement only applies until the Senior Vice President meets his or her stock ownership target.
Policy Prohibiting Hedging and Pledging of Our Stock
We have adopted a stringent policy that prohibits (i) our employees of the company who are officers, and (ii) directors from engaging in hedging transactions or arrangements designed to lock in the value of their holdings of our securities, as well as short sales and the trading of options in our securities. This prevents our officers and directors from engaging in transactions involving our securities without having the full risks and rewards of ownership.
We also prohibit our officers and directors from holding our securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.
2422| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Related Party Transactions |
Our Board has adopted written policies and procedures for the review and, if appropriate, approval of related party transactions by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Our policy defines a Related Party to include any director, executive officer or person owning more than five percent of the Company’s stock, any of their immediate family members and any entity with which any of the foregoing persons are employed or affiliated. A Related Party Transaction is defined as a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which the Company is a participant, if the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a Related Party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Related Party Transactions that are deemed immaterial under applicable disclosure requirements are generally deemed pre-approved under these written policies and procedures, including transactions with an entity with which a Regency director’s sole relationship is as a non-employee director and the total amount involved does not exceed 1% of the entity’s total annual revenues.
Criteria for the Nominating and Governance Committee’s approval or ratification of a Related Party Transaction include, in addition to factors that the committee otherwise deems appropriate under the circumstances:
| ◾ | whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available from an unaffiliated third party; and |
| ◾ | in the case of a non-employee director, whether the transaction would disqualify the director from (1) being deemed independent under Nasdaq Stock Market listing requirements or (2) from serving on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee under Nasdaq Stock Market and other regulatory requirements. |
During 20212023 there were no related party transactions required to be disclosed under SEC rules.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |2523
| Compensation of Directors
Non-employee directors are compensated for their service on our Board as shown below. Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for serving as directors.
Elements of 2021 2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation
Annual cash retainer: |
|
$75,000 |
| |||
Additional annual cash retainer for: | ||||||
Lead Director | $35,000 | |||||
Chair of Audit Committee and Chair of Investment Committee | $20,000 | |||||
Chair of Compensation Committee and Chair of Nominating and Governance Committee | $15,000 | |||||
Members of Audit Committee and members of Investment Committee (except Chairs) | $15,000 | |||||
Members of Compensation Committee and members of Nominating and Governance Committee (except Chairs) | $10,000 | |||||
Annual stock rights award | ||||||
Additional stock | $10,000 | |||||
We pay directors’director retainers quarterly, in cash or, at the election of each director, in shares of our common stock issued under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, which are valued based on the average closing price of our common stock during the quarter in which the fees are earned. Directors may also defer their retainers and annual stock awards, at their election, under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Directors also receiveWe grant director stock rights awards immediately following each annual meeting of shareholders. Stock rights vest 100% on the first anniversary date of grant.
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation of our directors, with benchmarking and advice from the committee’s independent compensation consultant. Any proposed changes are reviewed with and approved by the full Board. Commencing with the 2022 stock rights award, directors will receive stock rights valued at $125,000 (based on stock price on or about the grant date), rather than past practice of awarding 2,000 shares to each director. After consultation with its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that this modified award structure, which is a common practice among peer group companies, will better align directors with shareholders and eliminate award value volatility.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 20212023
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | Stock Awards(2) | Total | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | Stock Awards(2) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Joseph F. Azrack | $120,000 | $126,860 | $246,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | $115,000 | $126,860 | $241,860 | $120,000 | $125,047 | $245,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | $140,000 | $136,860 | $276,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | $140,000 | $135,011 | $275,011 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell (3) | $90,778 | $165,097 | $255,875 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | $115,000 | $126,860 | $241,860 | $115,000 | $125,047 | $240,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | $100,000 | $126,860 | $226,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | $104,806 | $125,047 | $229,853 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | $100,000 | $126,860 | $226,860 | $113,242 | $125,047 | $238,289 | ||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | $100,000 | $126,860 | $226,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | $100,000 | $125,047 | $225,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | $95,000 | $126,860 | $221,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | $110,000 | $125,047 | $235,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III(3) | $58,242 | $132,700 | $190,942 | |||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | $100,000 | $125,047 | $225,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles | $125,000 | $126,860 | $251,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles (4) | $42,239 | $0 | $42,239 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) In 2021,2023, the following directors elected to receive certain of their directors’ fees in the form of shares of our common stock in lieu of cash:
Name | Number of Shares Issued In Lieu of Director Fees | |||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | ||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||
Peter D. Linneman | ||||||
(2) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”) which for all directors was $63.43$59.66 per share on May 5, 2021 for all except for Mr. Simmons whose3, 2023. In addition, Kristin Campbell received a pro-rated grant priceupon her election to the board, which was $66.35 on June 1, 2021.608 shares at $65.98 per share.
(3) Mr. SimmonsMs. Campbell joined theour Board on June 1, 2021.January 15, 2023.
(4) Mr. Wattles served as a director until our Annual Shareholder Meeting on May 3, 2023, when he retired from the Board.
2624| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Proposal Two: Advisory Vote onApproval of the Company’s Executive Compensation |
Proposal Two: Advisory Vote onApproval of the Company’s Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee of our Board designs our executive compensation programs to attract, motivate and retain executives who are capable of leading our Company to achievement of our key financial and strategic goals, to be competitive with comparable employers, and to align the interests of management and the Company with those of our shareholders. Below is a summary of the key principles that underlie our compensation program design.
We encourage you to closely review our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections, where we provide more detail on our compensation programs in general and specifically for 2021.
We continually seek to refine and improve our executive compensation programs and policies consistent with evolving best governance practices in our industry and in furtherance of our Company’s business strategy. We believe that compensation actually received by our executives reflects our goal to alignof aligning the interests of management with those of shareholders.
We encourage you to closely review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections of this proxy statement, where we provide more detail on our compensation programs in general and specifically for 2023.
The following highlights reflect our commitment to pay for performance and maintain a strong executive compensation governance framework.
Executive Compensation Highlights
|
| |||||
|  | |||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
As required by Section 14A951 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,Dodd-Frank and related SEC rules, you are being asked to approve an advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers. This proposal, commonly known as a “say on pay” proposal, gives you the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our fiscal year 20212023 compensation program and policies for our named executive officers.officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Although this advisory vote is non-binding, our Board and Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into account when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE
PROXY STATEMENT UNDER THE HEADINGS “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS” AND “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.” |
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |2725
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Letter from Our Compensation Committee Chair
Dear Fellow Regency Shareholder,
On behalf of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Regency Centers, I am pleased to present an overview of the Company’s compensation programs and the performance-based pay of our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) for their performance in 2021.2023.
20212023 was aanother year of continuingexceptional results for Regency Centers. Led by our dedicated and evolving recovery fromtalented executives, the disruption causedRegency Centers team executed over 8 million square feet of new and renewal leases growing Same Property Net Operating Income by 3.6% (exclusive of receivables reserved during 2020-2021), and achieved record-high shop space (<10,000 SF) occupancy of 93.4% at year-end. In August, Regency grew its portfolio through the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet despiteacquisition of Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc., owner of over 70 high quality shopping centers in the uncertain environmentNew York Tri-state area. The Company also started over $250 million of development and redevelopment projects in 2023 and currently has over $460 million of projects in process. This continued success allowed the Regency accomplishedCenters Board of Directors to declare a great deal3% dividend increase in the fourth quarter of 2023. With our high-quality portfolio of over the course of the last year. These accomplishments included significant new leasing to drive growth, outsized success480 primarily grocery-anchored centers in rent collections, continued strengthening of the Company’scompelling trade areas, a sector-leading balance sheet, and liquidity, robust investment activity,an exceptional team, Regency is well positioned for continued growth and cash flow and dividend growth. The pace ofvalue creation for our progress is a testament to the extraordinary efforts and resiliency of our employees, led by our talented executive team.shareholders.
The Compensation Committee isremains focused on aligning the interests of our executive team with the intereststhose of our shareholders by providing a meaningfultying their short- and long-term incentive opportunity based uponcompensation opportunities to the achievement of ourspecific financial and strategic goals. Our executive compensation programs are designed such that performance-based pay constitutes a significant majority of thetheir total potential compensation for our executive officers.compensation. We strive to establish rigorous financial and non-financial targets driven byto reward the Company’s overall strategy to rewardachievement of both short-term and long-term performance success, as well as to retain, develop and motivate our key talent.people.
The 2021 annual incentive plan’s financial metric,We have historically focused on Core Operating Earnings (COE)per Share as the key financial metric by which to measure the performance of our top executives. We believe it represents the best measure of operating and financial performance. In 2023, similar to 2022, management and the Compensation Committee agreed that management should not unduly benefit or be penalized by the impacts of COVID-related collections. As such, in 2023 the Committee focused on Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share, which accountseliminated COVID-related collections impacts from the short-term incentive calculation. This metric was also used in 2022, and we anticipate it will also be used in 2024 for 80%the last time as these prior period impacts cease to meaningfully affect financial performance.
As demonstrated by the Company’s very strong results in 2023, with management achieving Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share of $3.93, the achievableexecutive team earned a matrix-based short-term incentive opportunity, was initially reviewed andpayout of 1.55 times target. This multiple reflects the meaningful financial outperformance by the Company against the objectives set by the Committee, as discussed in more detail in the unusually uncertain operating environment of the COVID-19 pandemic, very early in 2021. While in more “normal” times COE per Share is forecasted reasonably within ranges, 2021 COE proved to be unpredictable. Regency significantly outperformed the COE per Share levels of the incentive target throughout 2021, with much of this outperformance being driven by the collection of unpaid rent from 2020. This outperformance would have resulted in payouts well in excess of the maximum potential performance payout level of 2.0 times target for the COE per Share metric in the annual incentive plan. following Compensation, Discussion and Analysis (CD&A).
After thoughtful discussions and assessment of the various factors that drove this outperformance in 2021,In addition, the Compensation Committee made a discretionary decisioncontinued to reduce the annual incentive payout from the achieved 2.0 times target to 1.6 times target, which, based on an assessment of historical pay-for-performance relationships, the committee believes is a more reasonable and appropriate payout for management’s outperformance in 2021.
In addition,emphasize corporate responsibility-related objectives as the key component of our non-financial performance metric, in 2021 we placed a greater emphasis ongiven their importance to the Company’s continued financial success. The committee regularly reviews progress against management’s corporate responsibility (ESG) in our overall program design by valuing these objectives at 20% of the total annual incentive. The Compensation Committee regularly reviewed progress against the ESG objectives, which waswere measured both quantitativelyqualitatively and qualitatively,quantitatively, and determined that the executive team achieved theirits objectives in this area, as well.further described in the CD&A.
WeA significant portion of our NEOs’ target total direct compensation is paid in long-term incentives, and a significant portion of our NEO’s long term incentives is paid in performance shares, because we believe that performance shares tied to relative total shareholder return motivate executives to focus on sustained financial performance and longer-term value creation. Our NEOs earned 105% of the target performance share award that was based upon total shareholder return for the 2021 – 2023 performance period, and we granted a new tranche of awards for the 2023 – 2025 performance period to continue to align executive pay opportunity with the interest of our shareholders.
26| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
As a committee, we approached our pay assessmentwork in 20212023 with the same robust governance and oversight we have always applied to our compensation programs.responsibilities. We will continue to closely monitor all components of our payexecutive compensation programs, continuously balancingand balance our objective to incent, motivate and retain our talentNEOs while reasonably aligningdoing our best to align outcomes with those of our shareholders. Our overarching objective is that our compensation programs drive the behaviors and results the Board expects and that are in the best interests of our Company and you, our shareholders.
I encourage all shareholders to read our Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), in which we provide&A. It provides an overview of our executive compensation programs and the underlying philosophy used to develop them, as well as moreinformation about the 20212023 objectives the committeeCommittee set for our executive team.
We appreciate the trust you have placed in us and thank you for your investment in Regency Centers.
Sincerely,
Deirdre J. Evens
Chair of Compensation Committee
28|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|27
|Compensation Discussion and Analysis|
 |  |  |   |  | |||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board |
Lisa Palmer President and Chief |
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice |
Operating Officer | Nicholas A. West Region |
For information with respect to Mr. Stein and Ms. Palmer, please refer to theProposal 1: Election of Directors section.in this proxy statement.
Michael J. Mas, age 46,48, has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since August 12, 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Mas had served as Managing Director of Finance since February 2017. He served as Senior Vice President of Capital Markets from January 2013 to January 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Mas served as Vice President of Capital Markets and JV Portfolio Management from December 2004 to December 2012. Before joining our Company in 2003, he worked with Deloitte & Touche LLP as Manager for Assurance and Advisory services, supervising professional accountants providing client services in Southeast Florida. Mr. Mas holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of North Florida and a M.B.A. from Florida Atlantic University. He is a member of ICSC and Nareit.
James D. ThompsonAlan T. Roth, age 66,49, has been our Executive ViceEast Region President and Chief Operating Officer since August 12, 2019. Prior toJanuary 1, 2024. Before that, Mr. ThompsonRoth served as our Executive Vice President, National Property Operations and East Region President from January 2023 to December 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Roth served as Senior Managing Director, Northeast Region from September 2020 to December 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Roth served as Managing Director from January 2016 to September 2020. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President and Senior Market Officer of Operationsthe Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Portfolio, overseeing more than eight million square feet at sixty-eight shopping centers. Before that, Mr. Roth held the position of Vice President and Regional Officer. Before joining our Company as a leasing agent in 1997, Mr. Roth handled tenant representation, shopping center leasing and land sales for Midland Development Group. Mr. Roth holds a Bachelor of Science from Kelley School of Business at Indiana University. He is a member of ICSC, serves on the Planning Committee for ICSC Open Air Conference and is a member of Nareit.
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer, age 43, has been our West Region President and Chief Investment Officer since January 1, 2016.2024. Before that, Mr. Wibbenmeyer served as our Executive Vice President, West Region President from January 2023 to December 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Wibbenmeyer served as Senior Managing Director, West Region from September 2020 to December 2022. Prior to that, he served as Managing Director—East Region since 1993. Mr. ThompsonDirector from January 2016 to September 2020. Prior to that, he served as ExecutiveSenior Vice President and Senior Market Officer. Before that, Mr. Wibbenmeyer held the position of Vice President of Investments and Regional Officer. Before joining our predecessor real estate division from 1981 to 1993.Company in 2005 as Manager of Investments, Upper Midwest, Mr. ThompsonWibbenmeyer served as a retail broker for Mid-America Real Estate Group. Mr. Wibbenmeyer holds a Bachelor of ScienceBusiness Administration from Auburn University.the University of Notre Dame. He is a member of ICSC and Nareit, and member of the Advisory Board for the Bergstrom Center for Real Estate Studies at the University of Florida.Nareit.
Dan M. Chandler, III (not pictured) was our Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer until his resignation from the Company effective March 26, 2021.
Our compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain industry-leading executives who are capable of driving achievement of our key financial and strategic goals.objectives. We compensate our executives through a mix of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity compensation, with an emphasis on the roleuse of performance-based incentives in contributing toas a very significant portion of total compensation. Our compensation programs areprogram is designed to be competitive with comparable employers and to align the interests of management with our shareholders by awarding performance-based compensation to incentivize the achievement of specific key objectives.
28| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Oversight of Compensation
The Compensation Committee of our Board (“Compensation Committee” or “the committee”) is responsible for designing and implementing our executive pay philosophy, evaluating compensation against the market and approving the material terms of executive compensation arrangements for our NEOs including incentive plan participants, award opportunities, performance goals and compensation earned under our incentive plans. The committee routinely consults with its independent compensation consultant and other advisors in making its decisions, as it seemsdeems appropriate. The NEOs are not present during the committee’s discussions of their respective compensation. The committee is comprised entirely of independent directors as defined by the Nasdaq Stock Market.Market listing requirements.
The committeeCompensation Committee evaluates the performance of both the Executive Chairman and the President & CEO and carefully considers decisions as to their respective compensation.reviews such evaluation with the full Board. With respect to our other NEOs, the committee considers the CEO’s input of the President & CEO as to their performance evaluationsassessments and recommended compensation arrangements. The compensation of all NEOs is subject to the final approval of the committee, and compensation of both the Executive Chairman and President & CEO, respectively, is recommended by the committee to the full Board for its consideration and approval.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |29
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The committee utilizes outside advisors from Semler Brossy, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, to provide benchmarking, analysis, advice and other relevant data analysiscounsel regarding competitive pay levels, pay program design and evolving trends and practices. Until the summer of 2021, the committee engaged Willis Towers Watsonpractices, primarily with respect to assist in the refinement of our incentive plans, assist in the preparation of our pay disclosurespeers and value our equity awards. In the summer of 2021, after a thorough RFP process, the committee engaged a new independent compensation consulting firm, Semler Brossy, to advise the committee, including benchmarking and evaluating competitive pay practices and providing other relevant data and analysis to the committee.REIT industry participants. Representatives from Semler Brossy generally attend meetings of the Compensation Committeecommittee and participate in its executive sessions as requested and are available to communicate directly with the Compensation Committeecommittee Chair and its members outside of meetings. In addition, in 2021 Semler Brossy and outside counsel advised the committee in the design and drafting of new severance and change of control agreements with our NEOs, as described on page 45.
The Compensation Committee considers all factors relevant to the consultant’s independence from management, including those identified by the Nasdaq Stock Market listing requirements, and has determined that Semler Brossy has no conflictconflicts of interest and is independent.
20212023 Say on Pay Results and Shareholder Engagement
Our Board and Compensation Committee value the opinionsviews and input of our shareholders and are committed to ongoing engagement on executive compensation practices. The committee specifically considers the results from the annual shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation. At the 20212023 annual meeting of shareholders, more than 94%94.8% of the votes cast on the advisory voteresolution on executive compensation were cast in favor of our executive compensation. We believe those voting results and the voting results over the past several years of our Say on Pay vote demonstrate continued strong shareholder support for our programs.programs and their implementation.
Targeted Level of Compensation
We endeavor to set total direct compensation, which consists of base salary, annual cash incentives and the expected value of long-term incentives, forat target performance levels in range of the expected median of peer companies, dependingas listed on the following page, while also taking into account various factors including the experience level and responsibilities of theeach individual executive and competitive market conditions. Annual increases in base salary, cash incentives, performance shareslong term (equity) incentives and total direct compensation while not guaranteed, may be more robust when paytotal direct compensation is below the median, and more moderatemoderated when those compensation levels areit is more than 10% above the median or exceedexceeds the 60th percentile for the peer 60th percentile. Compensation forgroup. Actual compensation earned by our top executives, including our NEOs, can be highly variable from year to year due to heavy weighting toward performance-based incentive compensation rather than fixed components.
30|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|29
|Compensation Discussion and Analysis|
We utilizeTo evaluate and set total direct compensation, the committee utilizes a peer group analysis of total direct compensation for similar positions prepared annually by the committee’s independent compensation consultant. The principleskey principals by which the peer group was createdis selected and maintainedannually updated are that companies be leaders in a comparablethe REIT industry (i.e. REITs)(but not limited to the shopping center sector) and comparable in size, generally based on total market capitalization ranging from half to double our size. We evaluateWorking with the committee’s independent compensation consultant, the committee evaluates the appropriateness of the group annually (basedbased on a variety of factors, including merger and acquisition activity,and other similar corporate changes, growth and asset class focus, etc.) and make adjustments accordingly.adjusts the peer group as the committee deems appropriate after considering the facts and circumstances. After evaluating the peer group for 2024, the committee removed Duke Realty Corporation due to its acquisition by Prologis (the combined entity was too large for our peer group in the summer of 2021 with the committee’s new compensation consultant, we removed Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., SITE Centers Corp. and Weingarten Realty Investors,group) and added CousinsAmerican Homes 4 Rent, Equity LifeStyle, Invitation Homes and Sun Communities to broaden the scope and keep Regency centrally positioned within the peer group after our acquisition of Urstadt Biddle Properties Hudson Pacific, Kilroy, Spirit Realty and Vornado, while maintaining our philosophyInc. in August of considering “best-in-class” REITs of comparable size but not limited to the shopping center sector. Weingarten Realty Investors was acquired by another company and no longer exists as an independent, publicly traded entity and, therefore, was removed as a peer. SITE Centers Corp. and Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. were also removed, as both are no longer comparable in size to the Company. The added five peers are REITs comparable in enterprise and asset value with significant retail and/or office presence.2023.
Peer Company | Reviewed in Setting | Reviewed in Setting | ||||
|  | |||||
Boston Properties, Inc. | | | ||||
Brixmor Property Group, Inc. | | | ||||
Camden Property Trust | | | ||||
Cousins Properties Incorporated | | | ||||
Duke Realty Corporation | | |||||
Equity LifeStyle | | |||||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. | | | ||||
Federal Realty Investment Trust | | | ||||
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | | | ||||
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | | | ||||
Invitation Homes | | |||||
Kilroy Realty Corporation | | | ||||
Kimco Realty Corporation | | | ||||
Kite Realty Group Trust | | | ||||
NNN REIT (formerly National Retail | | | ||||
Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. | | | ||||
| | | ||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
UDR, Inc. | | | ||||
| | | ||||
| | |||||
| | |||||
30|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|31
|Compensation Discussion and Analysis|
Compensation Committee Actions & Decisions
During 20212023 and early 2022,2024, the Compensation Committee took the following actions and made the following decisions:
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Elements of Compensation
In designing our compensation program, we believe the pay of our NEOs should be predominantly performance-based because these individuals have the greatest ability to influence our Company’s operating and financial results and, therefore, value creation.creation for our shareholders. The charts below summarize the designed allocation of the 20212023 target compensation opportunity for our President and CEO and our other NEOs employed by the Company on the last day of 2021(excluding our Executive Chairman), respectively, based upon the three primary elementscomponents of our NEO compensation program (base salary, annual cash incentive and long-term incentive).
32|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|31
|Compensation Discussion and Analysis|
Base Salary
Base salaries are reviewed annually. The followingSeveral factors are considered in determining salary adjustments:adjustments, including market competitiveness, the roles and responsibilities of the executives, contributions to the Company’s success, an analysis of position requirements and the executives’ prior experience and accomplishments.
Named Executive Officers | 2020 Base Salary | 2021 Base Salary | % Increase | 2022 Base Salary | 2023 Base Salary | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman | $700,000 | $700,000 | 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | $825,000 | $900,000 | 9.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | $500,000 | $550,000 | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | $515,000 | $530,000 | 2.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan M. Chandler, III* Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer | $515,000 | $530,000 | 2.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and Chief Investment Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and Chief Investment Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and Chief Investment Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and Chief Investment Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Mr. Chandler resigned from Regency effective on March 26, 2021.
Annual Cash Incentives — Overview
The Compensation Committee sets rigorous performance goals thatto align pay with performance. A number of factors are considered, including prior year performance, current business environment, peer performance and the Company’s key financial and strategic objectives. The Company pays an annual cash incentive based on achievement of specified key corporate objectives. TheFor 2023, the annual cash incentive framework for our NEOs in 2021 was based 80% on Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share (as defined in Appendix A) and 20% on achievement of corporate responsibility (ESG) objectives.objectives except for Mr. Stein, who, as Executive Chairman, did not have an annual incentive opportunity in 2023.
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share
The Compensation Committee believes that Core Operating Earnings per Share is the financial metric most representative of management’s ability to meet the Company’s annual financial plan, as reviewed and approved by our Board, and the Company’s ability to make distributions to shareholders on a sustainable basis. It also serves as an important indicator of growth in our net asset value. The 2021 performance criteria forIn 2023, with feedback from management, the committee again modified the traditional Core Operating Earnings per Share metric isto eliminate the impacts of COVID-related collections (i.e., those relating to fiscal years 2020 or 2021) so that Core Operating Earnings per Share would better reflect the performance of the NEOs and the Company in 2023. Therefore, for 2023, the committee used Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share as the Company’s key financial metric as it did in 2022. The performance criteria for the Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share metric are set forth in the following table. Performance between levels will be interpolated, and payouts for performance below the “Low” performance level, if any, would be made only at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. To
In addition, to incentivize our NEOs to act in the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders, ourthe committee may normalizeexercise its discretion to modify the calculation of Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share so as not to penalize (or overly-benefit) our NEOs for taking actions that may have a negative (or positive) impact on Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share in the short term, such as the sale of assets and debt reduction, but are beneficial to the Company’s long-term positioning and prospects.
2021
32| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
2023 Performance Criteria for Annual Cash Incentive –
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share (80% Weight at Target)
Performance Level | Multiple of Target | 2021 Core Operating Earnings Per Share | Multiple of Target | 2023 Adjusted Core Operating | ||||||||
Maximum | ||||||||||||
Maximum | 2.00 | $3.27 | 2.00 | $4.01 | ||||||||
| 1.50 | $3.07 | |||||||||||
| 1.50 | $3.92 | |||||||||||
| 1.25 | $2.97 | |||||||||||
| 1.40 | $3.90 | |||||||||||
| 1.25 | $3.88 | |||||||||||
Target | ||||||||||||
Target | 1.00 | $2.87 | 1.00 | $3.83 | ||||||||
| 0.75 | $2.77 | |||||||||||
| 0.75 | $3.78 | |||||||||||
Low | 0.50 | $2.67 | ||||||||||
Below Low | Determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee | <$2.67 | ||||||||||
Underperform | ||||||||||||
Underperform | 0.50 | $3.73 | ||||||||||
Below Underperform | ||||||||||||
Below Underperform | Determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee | <$3.73 | ||||||||||
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |33
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Corporate Responsibility – ESG
On page 5, theThe Company’s commitment to its Four Pillars of Corporate Responsibility is discussed.discussed on page 5. Premised on Regency’s core valuesCore Values (see page 1), the committeeCompensation Committee believes these to be integral to the Company’s business strategy and financial performance, as well as our ongoing and future success. As such, annual progress towards ESGcorporate responsibility objectives is measured by the committee (with input from the Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee), and 20% of our NEOs’ annual incentive is tied to their achievements.
Regency Centers Four Pillars ofachievement. The Corporate Responsibility portion of the annual incentive is paid out at target if achievement of appropriate progress toward corporate responsibility objectives is achieved. In addition, because of the committee’s view of the relationship of corporate responsibility progress to financial performance, the event appropriate progress is at or above target and there is outperformance of the key financial metrics, the corporate responsibility portion of the annual incentive is awarded at the same multiple as such metrics - in this case, for Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share for NEOs. In the event that the key financial metrics pay out at less than target, then the corporate responsibility portion of the annual incentive will not pay out at more than target. The committee considers qualitative and quantitative measures of progress in evaluating progress toward our corporate responsibility objectives.
|
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Selected Key Elements
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |33 | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
|
|
The committee solicits data and other information from senior management to use in forming its own view of itsthe Company’s performance against specific ESGCorporate Responsibility (ESG) objectives, as well as from members of the Nominating and Governance Committee, which has been delegated oversight responsibilities by the Board over the Company’s ESGCorporate Responsibility program and initiatives.
Annual Incentive — 20212023 Results v. 20212023 Incentive Plan Goals
Regency’s 2021Led by our NEOs, the Company enjoyed meaningful outperformance in Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share results were well in excess of the maximum performance level. However, as explained in the letter from the Chair of the Compensation Committee (page 28), the committee carefully considered Company performance in 2021 and determined while the criteria for maximum payment of 2.0 times target were achieved, it was appropriate to award our NEOs an annual incentive equal to 1.6 times target. The Compensation Committee also determined that the 2021 Corporate Responsibility (ESG) objectives had been achieved, and per the plan if the ESG objectives are achieved the earned multiple is the greater of target or the multiple for the Core Operating Earnings per Share metric.Share. Performance results and the resulting cash awards are presented in the following tables. Mr. Stein’s compensation package does not provide him with an annual cash incentive opportunity, and Mr. Chandler was not eligible to receive a cash incentive due to his resignation.
34| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
20212023 Performance Results for Annual Cash Incentives
Performance Metric | Actual Performance | Resulting Multiple of Target Earned | Performance Level | Resulting Multiple of Target Earned | ||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings Per Share | $3.68 | 1.60 | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings Per Share | $3.93 | 1.55 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate Responsibility (ESG) | Achieved | 1.60 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate Responsibility (ESG) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Responsibility (ESG) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Responsibility (ESG) | Achieved | 1.55 | * | |||||||||||||
2021* See discussion on page 33.
2023 Cash Targets and Resulting Cash Incentives Earned
| Target | Actual | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Core Operating Earnings Per Share: Target | Corporate Responsibility (ESG): Target | Total Annual Incentive Target | Core Operating Earnings Per Share: Actual Cash Earned | Corporate (ESG): Actual | Total Actual Cash Incentive Earned | Adjusted Core Operating Earnings Per Share: Target | Corporate Responsibility (ESG): Target | Total Annual Incentive Target | Adjusted Actual Cash Earned | Corporate (ESG): Actual | Total Actual Earned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr.(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr.(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr.(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr.(1) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | $1,080,000 | $270,000 | $1,350,000 | $1,728,000 | $432,000 | $2,160,000 | $1,400,000 | $350,000 | $1,750,000 | $2,170,000 | $542,500 | $2,712,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | $440,000 | $110,000 | $550,000 | $704,000 | $176,000 | $880,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | $576,000 | $144,000 | $720,000 | $892,800 | $223,200 | $1,116,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | $424,000 | $106,000 | $530,000 | $678,400 | $169,600 | $848,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | $400,000 | $100,000 | $500,000 | $620,000 | $155,000 | $775,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | $400,000 | $100,000 | $500,000 | $620,000 | $155,000 | $775,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Mr. Stein’s compensation package does not currently provide him with an annual cash incentive opportunity.
Long-Term Incentives — Overview
The Compensation Committee strongly believes that equity awards with multi-year performance and vesting periods reinforces the alignment of the interests of executives with those of shareholders.shareholder value creation. As such, the vast majority of our long-term incentive awards are structured in this way for NEOs. We also have the ability under our Omnibus Incentive Plan to grant various types of equity awards, including stock rights awards (i.e., restricted shares), and performance share awards, to provide incentives for NEOs and others in management to work to create shareholder value over the long-term. In addition, the multi-year nature of the performance and vesting periods encourages retention of our executives.
Our
34| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
The committee has authority and flexibility to determine eligible participants, the types of awards and the terms and conditions of awards. TheyAwards are structured consistent with our compensation philosophy in that they provide above-median award opportunities for achievement and exceedance of Regency’s highthe Company’s performance expectations. TheIn 2023, the committee usesused two different types of stock-based awards to promote equity ownership by the participants and to emphasize the importance of total shareholder return. Performance share awards are earned subject to the achievement of multi-yearperformance goals approved by the committee as described below. Restricted share awards are earned subject to the participant’s continued employment with us.
20212023 Long-Term Incentive Weighting at Target
Long-Term Incentive Component | |||||||
Performance Shares: | 80% | ||||||
Time-based Restricted Shares | 20% | ||||||
Long-Term Incentives — Performance Shares
Performance goals are established for a multi-year performance period to tie incentive compensation to long-term results. Following the end of the period, performance versus targets areis calculated and reviewed by the Compensation Committee, awards are determined, and the corresponding number of shares vest. Dividend equivalents are accrued during the performance period and will vest when the underlying share award vests. No shares or dividends are earned if performance levels are not achieved at or in excess of threshold levels.
For 2021, performance2023 Performance Share Awards
Performance shares granted to our NEOs on January 28, 2021 were entirelyawarded in 2023 are based on total shareholder return relative togoals over the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index.2023 – 2025 performance period. We believe total shareholder return is akin to a scorecard for our investors, and it is a discerning measure of how our executives and our Company have performed over an extended period.
The performance share goals under the 20212023 plan, thatwhich are set in relation to the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index, are outlined below and were articulated in terms of three-year aggregate performance. Total shareholder return considers stock price growth as well as reinvestment of dividends. Performance between levels will be interpolated and the determination of the vesting of such performance shares will take place after the end of 2023.2025.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |35
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
20212023 – 20232025 Performance Criteria for Total Shareholder Return
(Relative to FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index)
Cumulative 3-Year Performance vs. Index | Performance Level | Multiple of Target | ||||||
+ 20% | Maximum | 2.00 | ||||||
+ 10% | 1.50 | |||||||
0% | Target | 1.00 | ||||||
- 10% | 0.50 | |||||||
- 20% | Threshold | 0.00 | ||||||
Performance shares awarded to our NEOs in 2019, 20202021, 2022 and 2021,2023, respectively, are set forth in the table for outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2021 2023 on page 4342 in this proxy statement.
The performance shares awarded for 2019the 2021 – 20212023 performance period were measured based on the same performance criteria as the 20212023 – 20232025 awards. Our NEOs earned 105% of the target performance share award, thatwhich was based upon total shareholder return for the 20192021 – 20212023 performance period as determined by the committee.period. Our relative total shareholder return for this performance period was 36%59% versus 35%58% for the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index—an outperformance of 100 basis points. As the table below illustrates, Regency Centers outperformed the index in twoeach of the three prior performance periods.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |35
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Scorecard for Relative Shareholder Return Performance
Performance Period | FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers | Regency | % of Target Payout | FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers | Regency | % of Target Payout | ||||||||||||||||||
2017—2019 | -5% | 2% | 135% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2019—2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019—2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019—2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019—2021 | 35% | 36% | 105% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2018—2020 | -23% | -25% | 90% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2020—2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020—2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020—2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020—2022 | 7% | 15% | 140% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2019—2021 | 35% | 36% | 105% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2021—2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021—2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021—2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021—2023 | 58% | 59% | 105% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Shares / Stock Rights Awards
A restricted share award is a grant of stock that vests after certain conditions are met.based on continued service over time. Restricted shares are used to motivate and retain employees as well as promote employee stock ownership. The restricted share awards we grant are usually “time-based”time-based and vest equally over a four-year period, subject to continued employment with us.Regency. We also refer to them as stock“stock rights awardsawards” because we do not issue the shares until the vesting conditions have been satisfied. We do not currently use stock options as part of our compensation package. Our stock-based awards are full-value shares that vest based upon continued service.
Name | Grant Value | |||||||
| In | Martin E. Stein, Jr. | $ | ||||||
Lisa Palmer | $ | |||||||
Michael J. Mas | $ | |||||||
| $ | |||||||
| $ | |||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Restricted shares awarded to our NEOs in 20212023 are set forth in the Grant of Plan Based Awards table on page 4241 in this proxy statement.
36| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
401(k) Profit-Sharing Plan
We strongly encourage all employees to save for retirement. To provide employees with the opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis, we sponsor a 401(k) profit-sharing plan pursuant to which we match employee contributions at 100% up to $5,000 for 2021. In addition, the2023. The Compensation Committee has the right to approve additional contributions including thein its discretion, to make such contributions when our corporate objectives are achieved.as it deems appropriate.
For 2021,2023, because of the Company’s strong financial performance, the Compensation Committee approved aan incremental discretionary profit-sharing award totaling $2$3.2 million, and the pool of funds is distributed pro-rata to all eligible employees based uponsubject to the application of a presumed salary cap of $68,000.$72,000. We review our Company match, employee participation levels and communication programs throughout the year to ensure that this benefit remains competitive with comparable companies as well as national benchmarks.
Compensation on Termination of Employment
WeWhile we do not offer employment agreements to our NEOs, we believe providing severance protection is important for retention purposes, as many companies we compete with offer it, particularly in connection with a change of control. Accordingly, our NEOs have severance and change of control agreements that provide the right to receive severance compensation if they are terminated without cause or they leave for good reason, as such terms are defined in the agreements. In a change of control situation, the agreements provide for severance using a “double trigger,” i.e., severance is payable only if a change of control occurs and the officer is terminated without cause or leaves for good reason“good reason” (as described under Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control on page 44) within two years after the change of control. We believe that such compensation gives our named executive officers incentive (1) to stay with the Company despite the possibility of losing employment after a change of control and (2) to focus on obtaining the best possible value for shareholders in a change of control transaction.
The agreements also provide that severance payments are subject to recoupment as required by any recoupment or “clawback” policy approved by our Board or similar requirement imposed by law. The Company has a robust executive compensation clawback policy;policies; see “Recoupment/Clawback Policies” in the next section.
36| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
For details on compensation on termination of employment, including death, disability and retirement, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation on– Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment”or Change-in-Control” on page 4544 of this proxy statement.
The Sarbanes-Oxley ActBoard has approved and the Company has implemented a Restatement Clawback Policy (the “Restatement Clawback Policy”), a copy of 2002 subjects incentive compensationwhich has been filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and stock sale profits of our CEO and CFO to forfeiture in the event of an accounting restatement resulting from any non-compliance, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under securities laws.
We have a more expansive clawback policy covering all of our executive officers, which also can be located on our website at https://investors.regencycenters.com. IfThe Restatement Clawback Policy (with all capitalized but undefined terms in this paragraph used as defined in the Restatement Clawback Policy) has been drafted to comply with the requirements of the applicable rules of the SEC, including, without limitation, Rule 10D-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and applicable listing standard of Nasdaq, the exchange on which the Company is listed. Under the Restatement Clawback Policy, if the Company issues a materialan accounting restatement of its financial statements due to the Company’s material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under theU.S. securities laws, the Board (or committee of the Board designated by the Board) shall, unless the Board or a Board committee will have the authority in its sole discretiondetermines it to recover any incentive compensation (i)be Impracticable, take reasonably prompt action to recoup all Recoverable Compensation received by any covered person (ii)Covered Persons during the three fiscal years immediately preceding the date of the accounting restatement issuance based on the erroneous data and (iii) that exceeds the amount that would have been paidApplicable Period. Pursuant to the covered personRestatement Clawback Policy, the Company is not permitted to indemnify any Covered Person for any compensation that the Covered Person is required to reimburse or forfeit pursuant to the Policy.
In addition to the Restatement Clawback Policy, under the accounting restatement, calculated on a pre-tax basis.
Ifseparate Misconduct Clawback Policy, if the Board or applicable committee determines that any covered personofficer of the Company has committed an act or acts constituting fraud, gross negligence or intentional misconduct, the Board or committee has the authority in its sole discretion, upon evaluating the associated costs and benefits, to recover any incentive compensation received by any covered person during the three fiscal years preceding the period from the date on which the misconduct first occurred or thereafter, calculated on a pre-tax basis. Recovery of such incentive compensation shall not be the Company’s exclusive remedy for any such misconduct.
In making any such determination relating to clawback of incentive compensation under the Misconduct Clawback Policy, the Board or applicable committee may consider such factors as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation (A) the practicability of obtaining such recovery and the costs to the Company and/or its shareholders of pursuing such recovery, (B) the likelihood of success of enforcement under governing law versus the cost and effort involved, (C) whether the assertion of a claim may prejudice theother interests of the Company, including in any related proceeding or investigation, (D) any pending legal proceeding relating to any applicable fraud gross negligence or intentional misconduct, or gross negligence, and (E) any other factors deemed relevant by the Board or committee.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |37
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
For purposes of a material financial restatement, covered person means any current or former officer who has or had been designated as an executive officer for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For purposes of misconduct, covered person means any current or former officer who has received incentive compensation.
Risk Consideration in our Compensation Program
The committeeCompensation Committee and Board believe that our compensation policies and practices are reasonable and align our employees’ interests with those of our shareholders. In addition, the committee and Board believe that our compensation policies and practices are designed and structured to avoid unreasonable risk of having a material adverse effect on the Company. The Committeecommittee believes that the fact that our executive officers have their annual and long-term incentive compensation tied to financial metrics and ESGCorporate Responsibility (ESG) objectives (in the case of annual incentives), as well as relative total shareholder return (in the case of long-term incentive awards) as compared to a peer group, encourages actions that focus on both annual and longer termlonger-term profitability and value creation for the benefit of shareholders. Our stock ownership policy and our policy prohibiting hedging and pledging transactions relating to our Company stock further align the interest of our senior officers with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Moreover, there are significant checks in place within our compensation structure so that employees whose compensation may have a shorter termshorter-term focus are closely managed by employees and officers whose compensation has a longer term focus.is in large part based on the Company’s and its shareholders’ interests over the long term.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the last fiscal year, no member of the Compensation Committee had a relationship with usRegency that required disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No executive officer of the Company served as: (i) a member of the Compensation Committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of the Company; or (ii) a member of the Board of Directors of another entity, one of
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |37
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis
whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of the Company. None of the members of our Compensation Committee is an officer or employee of our Company, nor have they ever been an officer or employee of our Company.
Our stock ownership policy is designed to focus our senior officers and directors on long-term shareholder value creation. Our policy sets stock ownership targets for senior officers as a multiple of base salary and for non-employee directors as a multiple of their annual retainer (exclusive of fees for committee service).
The targets, which are measured based on the Company’s trailing 36-month average common stock price, are to be achieved by directors and senior officers over a maximum five-year period. Our stock ownership policy also requires all covered participants to retain 25% of the shares they receive as direct compensation (on a pre-tax basis) after being hired, promoted or elected into such positions so long as they remain a senior officer or director. With respect to Senior Vice Presidents, the retention requirement only applies until the Senior Vice President meets his or her stock ownership target.
Policy Prohibiting Hedging and Pledging of Our Stock
We have adopted a stringent policy that prohibits our officers and directors from engaging in hedging transactions or arrangements designed to lock in the value of their holdings of our securities, as well as short sales and the trading of options in our securities. This prevents our officers and directors from engaging in transactions involving our securities without having the full risks and rewards of ownership.
We also prohibit our officers and directors from holding our securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.
Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) ofTo the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) generally prohibits any publicly held corporation from taking aextent allowable by applicable law, executive compensation will be deductible by the company for federal income tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million in any taxable year paid to any “covered employee,” a group that generally includes our NEOs. Although the Compensation Committee intends to consider the impact of Section 162(m) in structuring compensation programs, the committee expects its primary focus to continue to be on creating programs that address the needs and objectives of the Company regardless of the impact of Section 162(m). As a result,purposes. However, the Compensation Committee may make awards and structure programsdesign compensation program components that are non-deductiblenot deductible. In addition, in December 2020, the Internal Revenue Service released final regulations under SectionInternal Revenue Code (IRC) section 162(m)., which limit the deductibility of certain executive compensation amounts. Because we intend to qualify as a REIT under the IRC, we generally distribute 100% of our net taxable income each year and, as a result, do not pay U.S. federal income tax. As such, we do not expect limitations on executive compensation deductions to have a material impact on us. In addition, we expense base salaries and annual bonuses awarded in the year they are earned. In accordance with Accounting Standards Committee (ASC) Topic 718, we expense the value of equity awards granted over the vesting period of such grants.
38| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Committee Report |
The following Report of our Compensation Committee (this “Compensation Committee Report”) does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this Compensation Committee Report by reference therein.
For the year ended December 31, 2021,2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the CD&ACompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement with our management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the CD&ACompensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Regency Centers Corporation.
Deirdre J. Evens, Chair
Joseph F. Azrack
Thomas W. FurphyKristin A. Campbell
David P. O’Connor
James H. Simmons, III
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |39
| Executive Compensation
The following table summarizes the compensation of our NEOseach named executive officer (“NEO”) for 2021. We did not have any other executive officers serving on the last day of2023, 2022 and 2021. The amounts reported for stock awards may not represent the amounts that the NEOs will actually realize from the awards. Whether, and to what extent, a named executive officer realizes value will depend on Regency’s performance, stock price and continued employment. Please see the 2021 Total Earned Compensation Table for the total compensation realized by each NEO.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 20212023
Name and Principal Position(1) | Year | Salary | Stock Awards(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | All Other Compensation(3) | Total | Year | Salary | Stock Awards(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | All Other Compensation(3) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board | 2021 | $700,000 | td,531,376 | $0 | td7,156 | td,258,532 | Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board | 2023 | $500,000 | td,034,858 | $0 | $40,728 | td,575,586 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | $700,000 | td,492,779 | td50,000 | td7,686 | td,470,465 | Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board | 2022 | $500,000 | td,451,563 | $0 | $40,554 | td,992,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | $900,000 | $3,501,615 | td,189,440 | td8,486 | $5,619,541 | $700,000 | td,531,376 | $0 | td7,156 | td,258,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | $900,000 | $3,950,257 | td,160,000 | td6,058 | $7,026,315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | $825,000 | $3,588,410 | $518,000 | td3,334 | $4,944,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | $610,000 | td,800,831 | $575,840 | td4,134 | $3,000,805 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | 2023 | td,000,000 | $5,536,318 | td,712,500 | td0,217 | $9,269,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | 2022 | td,000,000 | $5,184,152 | td,450,000 | td5,636 | $8,649,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $900,000 | $3,950,257 | td,160,000 | td6,058 | $7,026,315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | $550,000 $500,000 $412,000 |
(4) | | $1,506,376 $1,148,292 $540,518 |
| | $880,000 $225,000 $252,803 |
| | $12,469 $12,230 $12,340 |
| | $2,948,845 $1,885,522 $1,217,661 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, | 2023 | $600,000 | td,759,195 | td,116,000 | td7,078 | $3,492,273 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, | Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, | 2022 | $570,000 | td,503,404 | $798,000 | td4,970 | td,886,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $550,000 | td,506,376 | $880,000 | td2,469 | td,948,845 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | 2021 | $530,000 | td,334,898 | $848,000 | td7,156 | td,740,054 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | $515,000 | td,343,501 | td32,000 | td7,686 | td,118,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | $500,000 | td,100,406 | $472,000 | td0,068 | td,092,474 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and | Alan T. Roth East Region President and | 2023 | $500,000 | td,134,858 | $775,000 | td7,126 | td,426,984 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth East Region President and | 2022 | $465,000 | $598,954 | $506,700 | td3,510 | td,584,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan M. Chandler, III Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer(5) | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | $132,500 $515,000 $500,000 |
| | $1,308,898 $1,343,501 $1,100,406 |
| | $0 $206,000 $472,000 |
| | $110,327 $13,334 $14,576 |
| | $1,551,725 $2,077,835 $2,086,982 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer West Region President and | 2023 | $500,000 | $1,134,858 | $775,000 | $13,680 | $2,423,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Martin E. Stein, Jr.Alan T. Roth was Chairman and CEO until his transitionpromoted to Executive ChairmanSenior Managing Director, East Region effective January 1, 2020. Lisa Palmer2022 and was further promoted to Executive Vice President, National Property Operations and East Region President, effective January 1, 2023 and was appointed on January 1, 2024 to East Region President and Chief Financial Officer until she becameOperating Officer. Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer was promoted to Executive Vice President, effective August 12, 2019. Ms. Palmer becameWest Region President, and CEO effective January 1, 2020. Mr. Mas assumed the position of Executive Vice2023 and was appointed on January 1, 2024 to West Region President Chief Financial Officer effective August 12, 2019. Mr. Thompson became Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Mr. Chandler became Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer effective August 12, 2019. Mr. Chandler resigned from the Company effective on March 26, 2021.Officer.
(2) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for restricted stockshare awards and performance-based and market-based performance share awards. We use a Monte Carlo simulation model to value market-based awards, i.e., for performance awards tied to relative total relative shareholder return. Our model estimates the fair value of the award based on our data and that of the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index.
20212023 Stock Awards. The goals for performance share awards granted in 2021 are2023 based entirely upon total shareholder return are entirely market-based as compared to other publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies in our sector, as represented by the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index.
The awards granted on February 2, 2023, assumed (a) stock price volatility of 45.5% for Regency and 46.6% for the index, (b) risk-free interest rates of 3.75%, (c) Regency’s beta versus the index of 0.955, and (d) no dividend yield assumption given that the award includes dividend equivalents that are earned only to the extent that the underlying shares are earned. Based on the performance goals and these capital market assumptions, the market-based awards issued on February 2, 2023, were valued at $70.47 per share using the Monte Carlo model.
The 2023 stock awards also include the grant date fair value of restricted share awards to Ms. Palmer and Messrs. Stein, Mas, Roth and Wibbenmeyer.
2022 Stock Awards. The goals for performance share awards granted in 2022 based upon total shareholder return are entirely market-based as compared to other publicly traded companies in our sector, as represented by the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index.
The awards granted on February 1, 2022, assumed (a) stock price volatility of 43.1% for Regency and 44.5% for the index, (b) risk-free interest rates of 1.39%, (c) Regency’s beta versus the index of 0.926, and (d) no dividend yield assumption given that the award includes dividend equivalents that are earned only to the extent that the underlying shares are earned. Based on the performance goals and these capital market assumptions, the market-based awards issued on February 1, 2022, were valued at $74.98 per share using the Monte Carlo model.
The total for Mr. Roth also includes a performance share award granted in 2022 that is based upon Adjusted Same Property NOI growth performance. The amount represents the grant date fair value under ASC Topic 718.
The 2022 stock awards also include the grant date fair value of restricted share awards to Ms. Palmer and Messrs. Stein, Mas and Roth. Mr. Roth’s award was made in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, National Property Operations and East Region President which was effective January 1, 2023.
2021 Stock Awards. The goals for performance share awards granted in 2021 based upon total shareholder return are entirely market-based as compared to other publicly traded companies in our sector, as represented by the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index.
The awards granted on January 28, 2021, assumed (a) stock price volatility of 42.6% for Regency and 43.7% for the index, (b) risk-free interest rates of 0.18%, (c) Regency’s beta versus the index of 0.929, and (d) no dividend yield assumption given that the award includes dividend
40| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation |
equivalents that are earned only to the extent that the underlying shares are earned. Based on the performance goals and these capital market assumptions, the market-based awards issued on January 28, 2021, were valued using the Monte Carlo model at $42.63 per share.
The 2021 stock awards also include the grant date fair value of restricted stockshare awards to Ms. Palmer and Messrs. Stein Chandler, Thompson and Mas. Mr. Chandler forfeited his outstanding stock awards when he resigned on March 26, 2021.
2020 Stock Awards. The goals for performance awards granted in 2020 based upon total shareholder return are entirely market-based.
The awards issued on January 31, 2020 assumed (a) stock price volatility of 18.5% for Regency and 18.9% for the index, (b) risk-free interest rates of 1.30%, (c) Regency’s beta versus the index of 0.893, and (d) no dividend yield assumption given that the award includes dividend equivalents that are earned only to the extent that the underlying shares are earned. Based on the performance goals and these capital market assumptions, the market-based awards issued on January 31, 2020 were valued using the Monte Carlo model at $73.54 per share.
The 2020 stock awards also include the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards to Ms. Palmer and Messrs. Stein, Chandler, Thompson and Mas.
2019 Stock Awards. The goals for performance awards granted in 2019 based upon total shareholder return are entirely market-based.
The awards issued on January 31, 2019 assumed (a) stock price volatility of 19.3% for Regency and 19.3% for the index, (b) risk-free interest rates of 2.43%, (c) Regency’s beta versus the index of 0.909, and (d) no dividend yield assumption given that the award includes dividend equivalents that are earned only to the extent that the underlying shares are earned. Based on the performance goals and these capital market assumptions, the market-based awards issued on January 31, 2019 were valued using the Monte Carlo model at $65.03 per share.
The 2019 stock awards also include the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards to Messrs. Chandler, Thompson and Mas.
40| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation |
The total for Mr. Mas also includes performance awards granted in 2019 that are not market based but based upon Core Operating Earnings per Share and Same Property NOI growth performance. The amount represents the grant date fair value under ASC Topic 718.
(3) The amounts in this column for 20212023 consist of the following: (a) a $8,630$11,300 contribution to our 401(k) and profit sharing plan for each executive;NEO; (b) a $1,000 holiday bonus for each executive other than Mr. Chandler;NEO; (c) life insurance premiums of $17,526$28,428 for Mr. Stein, and Mr. Thompson, $3,174$5,934 for Ms. Palmer, $2,070 for Mr. Mas, and $732$2,070 for Mr. Chandler;Roth and $1,380 for Mr. Wibbenmeyer; and (d) executive physical reimbursements of $ 3,254$1,983 for Ms. Palmer, and $769 for Mr. Mas; and (e) a payment representing accrued and unused paid time off of $100,965 for Mr. Chandler as a result of his resignation.
(4) The base salary$2,708 for Mr. Mas was $393,000 until August 31, 2019 and became $450,000 effective September 1, 2019 in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.$2,755 for Mr. Roth.
(5) Mr. Chandler resigned from the Company effective March 26, 2021.
We have estimated the ratio between our 2021 CEO’s total compensation and the median annual total compensation of all employees (except the chief executive officer). In determining the median employee we considered taxable compensation totals in 2021. We identified the “Median Employee” based on the taxable compensation of all full-time, part-time, and temporary employees employed by us on December 31, 2021. Then, we calculated the Median Employee’s compensation under the Summary Compensation Table rules. Our CEO in 2021, Ms. Palmer, had annual total compensation of $7,026,315 and our Median Employee had annual total compensation of $111,237. Therefore, we estimate that our CEO’s annual total compensation in 2021 is 63 times that of the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees.
2021 Total Earned Compensation
To supplement the information in the Summary Compensation table set forth above, we have included the additional table below, which shows “Total Earned Compensation” representing the total compensation realized by each NEO who was serving at the end of 2021 in each of the years shown in comparison to Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation table. Total compensation as calculated under SEC rules and, as shown in the Summary Compensation table, includes several items that are driven by accounting and actuarial assumptions, which are not necessarily reflective of compensation actually realized by the named executives in a particular year.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Total Earned Compensation(1) | Total Compensation from Summary | |||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. Executive Chairman of the Board | 2021 | $5,590,414 | $2,258,532 | |||||||||
| 2020 | $3,587,077 | $2,470,465 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | $5,274,699 | $5,619,541 | ||||||||||
Lisa Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | $6,119,202 | $7,026,315 | |||||||||
| 2020 | $2,793,956 | $4,944,744 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | $2,852,293 | $3,000,805 | ||||||||||
Michael J. Mas Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | 2021 2020 2019 |
| | $2,110,910 $1,035,636 $1,053,964 |
| | $2,948,845 $1,885,522 $1,217,661 |
| |||
James D. Thompson Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | 2021 | $2,946,721 | $2,740,054 | |||||||||
| 2020 | $1,579,258 | $2,118,187 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | $1,952,158 | $2,092,474 | ||||||||||
(1) Amounts reported as Total Earned Compensation differ substantially from the amounts determined under SEC rules as reported in the Total column of the Summary Compensation table. Total Earned Compensation is not a substitute for Total Compensation. Total Earned Compensation represents: (1) Total Compensation, as calculated under applicable SEC rules, minus (2) the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards (as reflected in the Stock Awards columns of the Summary Compensation table) plus (3) the market value of any equity awards that were earned in the applicable year but distributed the following year after they were earned and including accumulated dividends (such awards are disclosed in the following year’s proxy statement). For more information on Total Compensation under the SEC rules, see the narrative and notes accompanying the Summary Compensation table above.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |41
| Executive Compensation
As described in the CD&A,Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, annual cash incentive awards under our 20212023 incentive plan were based on Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share and achievement of our corporate responsibilityCorporate Responsibility (ESG) objectives by our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2021.2023. Mr. Stein’s compensation package does not currently provide him with an annual cash incentive opportunity. As determined by the Compensation Committee, annual cash incentive awards were awarded at 1.601.55 times the target level respectively, under the 20212023 annual incentive plan.
Equity awards that may be earned under our 20212023 long-term incentive plan are issued under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. Our 20212023 incentive plan provides for issuance to the NEOs of performance share awards that are based on specified thresholds for relative total relative shareholder return during 20212023 through 2023.2025.
Each performance share award provides for a specific number of shares depending on the extent to which the performance levels are achieved. No performance shares will be earned if the threshold levels are not achieved. Earned awards will vest, if at all, at the end of the performance period, and will be paid in shares. Dividend equivalents will vest when the underlying share award vests and will be paid in shares, as if dividends paid on unvested shares at the same rate as paid on our common stock were reinvested annually.
The following table sets forth information about plan-based awards granted to our NEOs during 2021,2023, all of which were made under our 20212023 incentive plan. Threshold amounts reflect the minimum amounts that we expect to be earned by our NEOs.
GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS DURING 20212023
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date of Equity Plan Awards | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | All Other of Stock | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards | Grant Date of Equity Plan Awards | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | All Other of Stock | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein. Jr. | 1/28/21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (1) | — | — | — | 11,745 | 23,490 | 46,980 | — | td,001,376 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein. Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein. Jr. | 2/2/23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/2/23 | (1) | — | — | — | 5,924 | 11,847 | 23,694 | — | $834,858 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11,115 | $530,000 | (3) | 2/2/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,962 | $200,000 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | 1/28/21 | (4) | $675,000 | td,350,000 | td,700,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (1) | — | — | — | 31,460 | 62,919 | 125,838 | — | td,682,257 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | 2/2/23 | (4) | $875,000 | td,750,000 | $3,500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/2/23 | (1) | — | — | — | 31,690 | 63,379 | 126,758 | — | $4,466,318 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26,594 | $1,268,000 | (3) | 2/2/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15,845 | $1,070,000 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 1/28/21 | (4) | td75,000 | $550,000 | td,100,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (1) | — | — | — | 11,745 | 23,490 | 46,980 | td,001,376 | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (3) | 10,591 | $505,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | Michael J. Mas | 2/2/23 | (4) | $360,000 | $720,000 | td,440,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/2/23 | (1) | — | — | — | 10,070 | 20,139 | 40,278 | td,419,195 | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | 1/28/21 | (4) | td65,000 | $530,000 | td,060,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (1) | — | — | — | 10,109 | 20,218 | 40,436 | — | $861,898 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,921 | $473,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/2/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,035 | $340,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan M. Chandler, III(5) | 1/28/21 | (4) | td65,500 | $530,000 | td,060,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (1) | — | — | — | 10,109 | 20,218 | 40,436 | — | $861,898 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/28/21 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,375 | $447,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | 2/2/23 | (4) | td50,000 | $500,000 | td,000,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/2/23 | (1) | — | — | — | 5,924 | 11,847 | 23,694 | — | $834,858 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/2/23 | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,443 | $300,000 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | 2/2/23 | (4) | td50,000 | $500,000 | td,000,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | 2/2/23 | (1) | — | — | — | 5,924 | 11,847 | 23,694 | — | $834,858 | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (3) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,443 | $300,000 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The amounts shown represent the range of stock awards that may be earned under our 20212023 long-term incentive plan for performance during 20212023 through 2023 for2025 based on relative total shareholder return. The amounts are based upon $67.53, which was the actualclosing market price per share of our common stock on the grant price of $47.68.date. Any earned award, together with dividend equivalents on the earned awards, will vest on January 28, 2024February 2, 2026, and be paid in shares. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”Analysis” in this proxy statement.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |41
| Executive Compensation
(2) We use a Monte Carlo simulation model to value market-based awards, i.e., for performance awards tied tobased upon relative total relative shareholder return. Our model estimates the fair value of the award based on our data and that of the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers Index. The January 28, 2021February 2, 2023 awards assumed (a) stock price volatility of 42.6%45.5% for Regency and 43.7%46.6% for the index, (b) risk-free interest rates of 0.18%3.75%, (c) Regency’s beta versus the index of 0.929,0.955, and (d) no dividend yield assumption given that the award includes dividend equivalents that are earned only to the extent that the underlying shares are earned. Based on the performance goals and these capital markets assumptions, the market-based awards issuedgranted on January 28, 2021February 2, 2023 were valued at $70.47 per share on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date of such awards (which was at target) and were determined as of the grant date using the Monte Carlo model at $42.63 per share.model.
(3) The amounts shown are for a restricted share grantawards granted in 2023 that vestsvest 25% per year over four years beginning in 2022.2024.
(4) The amount shown represents the range of possible cash incentive awards that could have been earned under our 20212023 incentive plan for our Adjusted Core Operating Earnings/shareEarnings per Share and corporate responsibilityESG performance in 2021.2023.
(5) The amounts shown for Mr. Chandler were forfeited as a result of his resignation effective on March 26, 2021.
42| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation |
The following table sets forth information about outstanding equity awards held on December 31, 20212023 by our NEOs. The amounts include unvested dividend equivalent units earned as of December 31, 2021. Mac Chandler forfeited all outstanding equity awards as a result of his resignation effective on March 26, 2021.2023.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 20212023
| Stock Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 14,834 | td,117,742 | 120,757 | (3) | $9,099,040 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36,271 | (4) | td,733,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48,325 | (5) | $3,641,289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 13,639 | $913,813 | 52,404 | (3) | $3,511,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 33,612 | (4) | td,252,004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24,474 | (5) | td,639,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | 35,529 | td,677,110 | 62,104 | (3) | $4,679,536 | Lisa Palmer | 45,408 | $3,042,336 | 140,368 | (3) | $9,404,656 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 87,189 | (4) | $6,569,691 | Lisa Palmer | 120,043 | (4) | $8,042,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 129,443 | (5) | $9,753,530 | 130,934 | (5) | $8,772,578 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 17,616 | td,327,366 | 6,102 | (3) | $459,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27,901 | (4) | td,102,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48,325 | (5) | $3,641,289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | Michael J. Mas | 15,317 | td,026,239 | 52,404 | (3) | $3,511,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 34,812 | (4) | td,332,404 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 41,605 | (5) | td,787,535 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | 16,065 | td,210,498 | 30,362 | (3) | td,287,777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32,643 | (4) | td,459,650 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 41,594 | (5) | $3,134,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | Alan T. Roth | 17,478 | td,171,026 | 10,293 | (3) | $689,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | 6,977 | (4) | $467,459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24,474 | (5) | td,639,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | 17,399 | td,165,733 | 10,293 | (3) | $689,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | 6,828 | (4) | $457,476 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24,474 | (5) | td,639,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) These represent stock rights awards (also referred to as restricted shares), which vest as follows:
Mr. Stein (#) | Ms. Palmer (#) | Mr. Mas (#) | Mr. Thompson (#) | Vesting Dates | ||||||||||||
| — | — | 994 | 901 | 100% on January 29, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| — | — | 1,403 | 1,898 | 50% per year on January 31, 2022 and 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 3,400 | 8,174 | 2,616 | 3,061 | 33 1/3% per year on January 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024 | ||||||||||||
| — | — | 1,708 | — | 50% per year on August 12, 2022 and 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 11,433 | 27,356 | 10,894 | 10,205 | 25% per year on January 28, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 | ||||||||||||
Mr. Stein (#) | Ms. Palmer (#) | Mr. Mas (#) | Mr. Roth (#) | Mr. Wibbenmeyer (#) | Vesting Dates | |||||||||||||||
| 1,229 | 2,955 | 946 | 473 | 473 | 100% on January 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| 6,199 | 14,832 | 5,907 | 7,627 | 7,627 | 50% per year on January 28, 2024 and 2025 | |||||||||||||||
| 3,151 | 11,254 | 3,264 | 4,788 | 4,709 | 33 1/3% per year on February 1, 2024, 2025, and 2026. | |||||||||||||||
| 3,060 | 16,367 | 5,201 | 4,589 | 4,589 | 25% per year on February 2, 2024, 2025, 2026 and 2027 | |||||||||||||||
(2) The amounts in this column have been computed based on $67.00 per share, which is the closing price of our common stock of $75.35 on December 31, 2021,2023, and include unvested dividend equivalent units as of that date. The actual value realized by the executive will depend on the market value of our common stock on the date that the awards vest and the actual number of shares that vest.
(3) These sharesperformance-based awards represent thepayouts at maximum, possible awards available onas of December 31, 2021 under our 2019 incentive plan based on total shareholder return during 2019 through 2021.
(4) These shares represent the maximum possible awards available on December 31, 2021 under our 2020 incentive plan based on total shareholder return during 2020 through 2022.
(5) These shares represent the maximum possible awards available on December 31, 20212023 under our 2021 incentive plan, based on total shareholder return during 2021 through 2023.
See “Compensation(4) These performance-based awards represent payouts at maximum, as of December 31, 2023 under our 2022 incentive plan, based on Terminationtotal shareholder return during 2022 through 2024.
(5) These performance-based awards represent payouts at maximum, as of Employment.”December 31, 2023 under our 2023 incentive plan, based on total shareholder return during 2023 through 2025.
42|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|43
|Executive Compensation|
Options Exercises and Stock Vested in 20212023
Our NEOs do not have any stock options outstanding and did not exercise any stock options in 2021.2023. The following table sets forth information about the vesting of both stock rights (i.e., restricted stock) and performance-based equity awards for our NEOs in 2021.2023.
| Stock Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(1) (#) | Value Vesting(2) ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(1) (#) | Value Vesting(2) ($) | ||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 55,307 | $2,609,391 | ||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 31,862 | $2,127,742 | ||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | 30,471 | $1,437,622 | 77,744 | $5,191,739 | ||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 7,159 | $353,770 | ||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 26,983 | $1,800,169 | ||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | 17,053 | $804,572 | ||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | 11,334 | $756,833 | ||||||||||||||
Dan M. Chandler, III(3) | 17,053 | $804,572 | ||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | 11,322 | $756,073 | ||||||||||||||
(1) The shares in this column include dividend equivalents issued in shares at the same time that the underlying shares vested.
(2) The amounts in this column have been computed based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date.
(3) $57,731 of the value realized on vesting has been deferred by Mr. Chandler under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Summary of Our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans
We do not have any defined benefit pension plans. However, we maintain two non-qualified deferred compensation plans that permit directors and a select group of management and other highly compensated employees designated by the Compensation Committee of our Boardcommittee to defer compensation they receive from us, in accordance with procedures established by the committee under the applicable plan. We also may make matching contributions to participant accounts, but to date have never done so. We established the second of the two plans in 2005 to comply with changes made at that time to the Internal Revenue Code, including the addition of Code Section 409A. Since establishment of the 2005 plan, we have required that all contributions be made under the 2005 plan since its establishment, but we continue to maintain the oldpre-2005 plan for contributions made to it prior to establishment of the 2005 plan. The two plans are substantially the same, except for differences in the 2005 plan due to the changes to the Internal Revenue Code.
Deferral elections must be made before the calendar year to which they relate and remain effective for the entire calendar year. All types of compensation may be deferred under the 2005 plan other than compensation from the exercise of stock options (which we do not currently utilize) and base salary.
We maintain a separate account for each participant in each plan and credit the participant’s contributions to the account. Each account is adjusted for investment gains and losses determined by assuming that the account is invested, in the percentages designated by the participant, in hypothetical investment options offered under the plans, including shares of our common stock. These hypothetical investment options are the same options that we offer under our 401(k) and profit sharingprofit-sharing plan to all eligible employees. However, participants in the deferred compensation plans have no right to require that the plan invest in the investments they designate. Rather, investment gains and losses on the hypothetical investment options serve as the method of measuring the total amount of our obligation to the participant under the plans. We also maintain a so-called rabbi trust to hold funds set aside under the plan, although the assets of the trust are subject to the claims of our unsecured general creditors in the event of our insolvency or bankruptcy.
Participant contributions under the plans are fully vested upon contribution. Amounts deferred under the plans, as adjusted for earnings, are not subject to income tax until actually paid to the participant. Participants will receive distributions of their account balances on (1) death, (2) disability, (3) termination of employment (subject to any deferral required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), or (4) the date elected in advance by the participant. Payments to a participant can be made either in a lump sum payment on the applicable distribution date or in annual installments over two to ten years beginning on the applicable distribution date. We make distributions in cash, except for account balances deemed invested in our common stock, in which case, we make the distributions in shares.
44|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|43
|Executive Compensation|
The following table sets forth information about participation by our NEOs in our deferred compensation plans.
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 20212023
Name | Executive in Last FY | Registrant in Last FY(1) | Aggregate in Last FY(2) | Aggregate Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE(3) | Executive in Last FY | Registrant in Last FY(1) | Aggregate in Last FY(2) | Aggregate Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | — | — | $4,935,109 | — | $11,761,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | — | — | $1,202,589 | — | $11,340,857 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | — | — | $3,070,394 | — | $23,399,447 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | $49,975 | — | $246,089 | $136,874 | $1,458,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan M. Chandler, III | $393,866 | — | $341,823 | $1,208,152 | $1,541,519 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | $628,528 | — | $129,279 | — | $1,479,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) We have the right to make, but have never made, matching contributions.
(2) Earnings or losses on non-qualified deferred compensation do not appear in the summary compensation tableSummary Compensation Table because they are not deemed above market.
(3) Includes contributions from salary or incentivesnon-equity incentive plan compensation reported in the summary compensation tableSummary Compensation Table in prior years’ proxy statements for the year earned to the extent the officer was a “named executive officer” for such proxy statement.
Compensation onPotential Payments Upon Termination of Employmentor Change-in-Control
Each of our NEOs hadhas a severance and change of control agreement that was effective from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 (referred to collectively as the “2021 contracts”), with the exception of Mr. Chandler whose contract terminated upon his resignation from the Company effective on March 26, 2021. The 2021 contracts, which expired on December 31, 2021, are no longer in effect.
In 2021, the Compensation Committee, after consultation with its advisors, recommended to the Board that the Company enter into new severance and change of control contracts with each of its NEOs, excluding Mr. Chandler, which are substantially similar to the 2021 contracts. The new agreements, which are dated as of January 1, 2022 (collectively or individually, the “Agreements”2023 (each, an “Agreement”),. Each Agreement automatically renewrenewed on January 1, 2023,2024, and will renew each January 1 thereafter, for an additional one-year term, unless either party gives written notice of non-renewal at least 90 days before the end of the currentthen-current term. The following describes the compensation that will be payable to our NEOs on termination of employment under these Agreements.
The severance benefits that the NEOsan NEO may receive if theirthe NEO’s employment terminates under certain conditions differ depending on whether a termination occurs (a) within a two year period following a Change of Control (as defined in the Agreement, with the two-year period following a Change of Control being referred to as the “Change of Control Period”), or (b) in the absence of a Change of Control or outside the Change of Control Period, in each case as described below. A Change of Control is defined generally as certain acquisitions of 30% or more of our stock, certain changes in a majority of the members of our Board, certain mergers and similar transactions resulting in a majority change in ownership of our stock, or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or shareholder approval of a complete liquidation or dissolution.
If aan NEO is terminated without “Cause” (as defined in the Agreement) or the NEO terminates his or her employment for “Good Reason” (also as defined in the Agreement), in either case absent a Change of Control or outside the Change of Control Period, then the NEO will receive a cash lump sum payment equal to the sum of (i) eighteen (18) months for Mr. Stein and Ms. Palmer, and twelve (12) months for Messrs. Mas, Roth and Thompson,Wibbenmeyer, respectively, of base salary, (ii) 150% (for Mr. Stein and Ms. Palmer) and 100% (for Messrs. Mas, Roth and Thompson)Wibbenmeyer), respectively, of the NEO’s average annual cash bonus, if any, paid with respect to the three full calendar years prior to termination of employment and (iii) the replacement cost of eighteen (18) months (for Mr. Stein and Ms. Palmer) and twelve (12) months (for Messrs. Mas, Roth and Thompson)Wibbenmeyer), respectively, of medical benefits, calculated as if such NEOsNEO elected COBRA continuation coverage. Cause“Cause” is defined generally as certain actions with respect to a felony, certain conduct constituting gross misconduct or gross negligence, certain breaches of the Agreement, certain conduct that could reasonably be expected to cause harm to our reputation, certain improper or violent conduct toward employees or third parties, certain breaches of law, policy or similar arrangements and certain failures to meet management expectations. Good Reason“Good Reason” is defined generally as certain changes of duties, certain changes to compensation, certain mandatory relocations and certain other material breaches of the Agreement.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |45
| Executive Compensation
If, during the Change of Control Period, an NEO is terminated without Cause or the NEO terminates his or her employment for Good Reason, then the NEO will receive a cash lump sum payment equal to the sum of (i) twenty four (24) months of base salary, (ii) 200% of the NEO’s average annual cash bonus, if any, paid with respect to the three full calendar years prior to termination of employment, (iii) the replacement cost of twenty four (24) months of medical benefits, calculated as if such NEO elected COBRA continuation coverage, and (iv) a pro-rated portion of the NEO’s target annual bonus applicable to the year in which such termination occurred. If such severance payments, or any other payments made to aan NEO in connection with a Change of Control, would be subject to the excise tax on “excess parachute payments” imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then the applicablesuch NEO will either pay the excise tax or have his or her payments capped at a level so there would be no excise tax depending upon which option provides the NEO with the greatest benefit on an after-tax basis.
44| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation |
Pursuant to each Agreement, the Agreements, a NEO’s receipt of any severance benefits is expressly conditioned on the NEO executing, and not revoking, a release of claims against the Company and the Partnership.its subsidiary, Regency Centers, L.P. The Agreements also include a confidentiality covenant and a covenant prohibiting the NEO from soliciting employees and customers to leave the Company for one year after termination of employment.
Under the terms of the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan and award agreements entered into by each NEO and the Company, in the event of a termination without Cause or the NEO’s resignation for Good Reason that is not related to a Change of Control, the NEO’s unvested equity awards that vest solely on the basis of time will vest on a pro-rated basis and the NEO’s performance shares will be earned on a pro-rated basis based on the level of achievement as of such date of termination. Upon a qualifying termination of employment after a Change of Control, time-vesting awards would vest in full and performance shares would vest in full with performance deemed achieved at the greater of actual performance to-date or target, except when weRegency or any surviving entity ceases to be a public company, in which case unvested equity awards are cashed out and performance shares are cashed out at their fair market value as of the date of the Change of Control with interest through the payment date.
If the NEO retires and provides specified advance notice before retiring, or if the NEO dies or terminates employment because of disability, all unvested stock rightsrestricted share awards that vest based on continued employment will vest immediately on the date of such retirement or termination. The NEO will remain eligible to receive performance shares awarded under our equity incentive plans before his or her retirement if the Company achieves the stated performance goals during the remainder of the performance period, as if the NEO had not retired. To qualify for these benefits on retirement, the NEO must retire after a specified age or with a combination of age plus years of service, depending on the benefit in question, as well as give usRegency the required number of years of advance notice of retirement.
46|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|45
|Executive Compensation|
The following table illustrates the additional compensation that we estimate would have been payable to each of our NEOs who was employed on the last day of 2021 on termination of employment under each of the circumstances described above, assuming the termination occurred on December 31, 2021 and that the 2021 contracts were in effect on that date.2023. The amounts shown are estimates and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that these individuals would receive on termination of employment.
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION TRIGGERED BY TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
IF TERMINATED ON THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF 20212023(1)
Name | Salary and Cash Bonus (Multiple) | Salary and Cash Bonus(2) | Health Benefits(3) | Early Vesting of Stock Grants | Total | Salary and Cash Bonus (Multiple) | Salary and Cash Bonus(2) | Health Benefits(3) | Early Vesting of Stock Grants | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination by Regency Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | (1.5x | ) | $2,450,820 | $29,763 | $5,867,956 | $8,348,540 | (1.5x) | $875,000 | $33,962 | $3,152,596 | $4,061,558 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | (1.5x | ) | $2,224,960 | $15,083 | $6,962,825 | $9,202,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | (1.5x) | $4,064,000 | $17,219 | $9,825,527 | $13,906,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | (1.0x | ) | $786,366 | $25,900 | $2,058,053 | $2,870,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | (1.0x) | $1,234,333 | $29,542 | $3,366,751 | $4,630,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | (1.0x | ) | $944,440 | $19,842 | $2,887,045 | $3,851,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | (1.0x) | $869,767 | $29,542 | $1,225,161 | $2,124,469 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | (1.0x) | $903,762 | $29,542 | $1,220,560 | $2,153,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: | Qualifying Retirement, Death or Disability: |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | n/a | — | — | $1,117,727 | (4) | $1,117,727 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | n/a | — | — | $3,953,801 | (4) | $3,953,801 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | n/a | — | — | $2,677,143 | (4) | $2,677,143 | (4) | n/a | — | — | $14,322,329 | (4) | $14,322,329 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | n/a | — | — | $1,327,347 | (4) | $1,327,347 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | n/a | — | — | $4,666,252 | (4) | $4,666,252 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | n/a | — | — | $1,210,471 | (4) | $1,210,471 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | n/a | — | — | $2,423,498 | (4) | $2,423,498 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control and Qualifying Termination: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | n/a | — | — | $2,413,201 | (4) | $2,413,201 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change of Control: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | (2.0x | ) | $3,267,760 | $39,684 | $8,445,269 | $11,752,713 | (2.0x) | $1,166,667 | $45,283 | $4,493,020 | $5,704,969 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | (2.0x | ) | $2,966,613 | $20,111 | $13,484,442 | $16,471,167 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | (2.0x) | $7,168,667 | $22,959 | $15,564,920 | $22,756,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | (2.0x | ) | $1,572,733 | $51,799 | $4,604,825 | $6,229,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | (2.0x) | $3,188,667 | $59,084 | $5,184,917 | $8,432,667 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | (2.0x | ) | $1,888,880 | $39,684 | $5,225,631 | $7,154,195 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | (2.0x) | $2,239,533 | $59,084 | $2,510,631 | $4,809,249 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas A. Wibbenmeyer | (2.0x) | $2,307,463 | $59,084 | $2,501,083 | $4,867,630 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The value of equity awards that vest early is based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2021.29, 2023, the last business day of fiscal 2023. The table does not include amounts payable under our non-qualified deferred compensation plans, which are described above under “Summary of Our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans.” Year-end accrued account balances under these plans are shown in the non-qualified deferred compensation table included elsewhere in this proxy statement. The table also does not include account balances under our 401(k) and profit sharingprofit-sharing plan, in which our executives participate on the same basis as all other participants.
(2) Cash bonus has been computed based on cash incentive compensation paid in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 20212022 (the three years preceding the date of termination). plus the 2023 target for the change of control termination.
(3) Medical, dental and vision insurance payments have been estimated based on current COBRA rates.
(4) The amounts shown do not include performance shares that would vest in 2022, 2023, 2024 or 20242025 to the extent that we achieve the stated performance goals for those years. The values assume a payout level equal to target. Actual values paid will be based on actual performance. For qualifying retirement, death or disability terminations, performance shares would vest and pay out under the terms of each applicable award and the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
46|REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year (1) | Summary Compensation Table Total for Principal Executive Officer (PEO) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2)(3) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs | Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs (2)(3) | Total Shareholder Return (8) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (8) | Net Income (in thousands) | Core Operating Earnings Per Share (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $9,269,035 | $9,530,042 | (4) | $2,479,595 | $2,586,810 | (4) | $125.99 | $117.03 | $370,867 | $3.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $8,649,788 | $6,276,760 | (5) | $2,291,627 | $1,608,823 | (5) | $112.72 | $104.46 | $488,035 | $3.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $7,026,315 | $14,742,502 | (6) | $2,374,789 | $3,894,473 | (6) | $130.41 | $119.43 | $366,288 | $3.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | $4,944,744 | $4,451,284 | (7) | $2,138,002 | $1,942,653 | (7) | $76.09 | $72.36 | $47,317 | $2.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year | PEO | Non-PEOs | ||
| 2023 | Ms. Palmer | Mr. Stein, Mr. Mas, Mr. Roth and Mr. Wibbenmeyer | ||
| 2022 | Ms. Palmer | Mr. Stein, Mr. Mas, Mr. James D. Thompson, and Mr. Roth | ||
| 2021 | Ms. Palmer | Mr. Stein, Mr. Mas, Mr. James D. Thompson, and Mr. Dan M. Chandler | ||
| 2020 | Ms. Palmer | Mr. Stein, Mr. Mas, Mr. James D. Thompson, and Mr. Dan M. Chandler | ||
PEO | Average Non-PEO | |||||||
Total Reported in 2023 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) | $9,269,035 | $2,479,595 | ||||||
| Less, value of Stock Awards reported in SCT | ($5,536,918 | ) | ($1,265,942 | ) | ||||
Plus, Year-End value of Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that are Unvested and Outstanding | $5,517,908 | $1,263,196 | ||||||
| Plus, Change in Fair Value of Prior Year awards that are Outstanding and Unvested | $216,704 | $72,835 | ||||||
| Plus, FMV of Awards Granted this Year and that Vested this Year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
Plus, Change in Fair Value (from prior year-end) of Prior Year awards that Vested this year | $63,313 | $37,126 | ||||||
| Less Prior Year Fair Value of Prior Year awards that Failed to vest this year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| Total Adjustments | $261,007 | $107,215 | ||||||
Compensation Actually Paid for Fiscal Year 2023 | $9,530,042 | $2,586,810 | ||||||
PEO | Average Non-PEO | |||||||
Total Reported in 2022 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) | $8,649,788 | $2,291,627 | ||||||
| Less, value of Stock Awards reported in SCT | ($5,184,152 | ) | ($1,212,490 | ) | ||||
Plus, Year-End value of Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that are Unvested and Outstanding | $4,567,311 | $1,085,215 | ||||||
| Plus, Change in Fair Value of Prior Year awards that are Outstanding and Unvested | ($1,288,996 | ) | ($384,424 | ) | ||||
| Plus, FMV of Awards Granted this Year and that Vested this Year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
Plus, Change in Fair Value (from prior year-end) of Prior Year awards that Vested this year | ($467,191 | ) | ($171,104 | ) | ||||
| Less Prior Year Fair Value of Prior Year awards that Failed to vest this year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| Total Adjustments | ($2,373,028 | ) | ($682,803 | ) | ||||
Compensation Actually Paid for Fiscal Year 2022 | $6,276,760 | $1,608,823 | ||||||
PEO | Average Non-PEO | |||||||
Total Reported in 2021 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) | $7,026,315 | $2,374,789 | ||||||
| Less, value of Stock Awards reported in SCT | ($3,950,257 | ) | ($1,420,337 | ) | ||||
Plus, Year-End value of Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that are Unvested and Outstanding | $7,830,287 | $2,153,181 | ||||||
| Plus, Change in Fair Value of Prior Year awards that are Outstanding and Unvested | $2,664,658 | $790,463 | ||||||
| Plus, FMV of Awards Granted this Year and that Vested this Year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
Plus, Change in Fair Value (from prior year-end) of Prior Year awards that Vested this year | $1,171,500 | $608,353 | ||||||
| Less Prior Year Fair Value of Prior Year awards that Failed to vest this year | $0 | ($611,977 | ) | |||||
| Total Adjustments | $7,716,187 | $1,519,684 | ||||||
Compensation Actually Paid for Fiscal Year 2021 | $14,742,502 | $3,894,473 | ||||||
PEO | Average Non-PEO | |||||||
Total Reported in 2020 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) | $4,944,744 | $2,138,002 | ||||||
| Less, value of Stock Awards reported in SCT | ($3,588,410 | ) | ($1,332,018 | ) | ||||
Plus, Year-End value of Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that are Unvested and Outstanding | $2,811,435 | $1,043,604 | ||||||
| Plus, Change in Fair Value of Prior Year awards that are Outstanding and Unvested | $56,637 | ($40,231 | ) | |||||
| Plus, FMV of Awards Granted this Year and that Vested this Year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
Plus, Change in Fair Value (from prior year-end) of Prior Year awards that Vested this year | $226,878 | $133,297 | ||||||
| Less Prior Year Fair Value of Prior Year awards that Failed to vest this year | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| Total Adjustments | ($493,460 | ) | ($195,349 | ) | ||||
Compensation Actually Paid for Fiscal Year 2020 | $4,451,284 | $1,942,653 | ||||||
| Adjusted Core Operating Earnings Per Share (Company-Selected Measure) |
| Corporate Responsibility Objectives |
| Relative Total Shareholder Return |
|Audit Committee Report|
The following Report of our Audit Committee (this “Audit Committee Report”) does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this Audit Committee Report by reference therein.
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its general oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.Board. A copy of its charter can be found on the Company’s website at www.regencycenters.com.https://investors.regencycenters.com. The directors who serve on the Audit Committee have no direct financial or personal ties to the Company (other than director compensation and equity ownership as described in this proxy statement) and are all “financially literate” and “independent” for purposes of the Nasdaq Stock Market listing standardsrequirements applicable to Audit Committee members. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Thomas G. Wattles, C. Ronald Blankenship, Deirdre J. Evens, Thomas J. Furphy, Karin M. Klein and Peter D. Linneman are Audit Committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. The Board of Directors has determined that none of the Audit Committee members has a relationship with the Company that may interfere with the member’s independence from the Company and its management.
Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting process. The Audit Committee met with management, KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors eight times during the year to consider and discuss the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee was on call as needed by management and KPMG LLP to meet with or discuss any issues arising during the course of the year. At the end of each quarterly meeting, the Audit Committee met privately with both KPMG LLP and the internal auditors, each of whom has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has extensively reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; accounting and financial reporting principles; establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures; establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting; evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures; evaluating the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; and evaluating any change in internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as well as expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee supervises the relationship between the Company and its independent registered public accounting firm, including making decisions about their appointment or removal, reviewing the scope of their audit services, approving non-audit services, approving the lead partner selection, approving the fees for their services, and confirming their independence. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” including the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, reasonableness of significant judgments, the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements and critical audit matters addressed during their audit. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG LLP the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. KPMG LLP has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1993.
In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed key initiatives and programs aimed at maintaining and strengthening the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. As part of this process, the Audit Committee continues to monitor the scope and adequacy of the Company’s internal auditing program, review staffing levels and steps taken to maintain the effectiveness of internal procedures and controls and oversees the implementation of the internal audit plan.
Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors approved that the audited financial statements be included in Regency’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.2023.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:Board:
| Deirdre J. Evens | ||||
| C. Ronald Blankenship | Thomas W. Furphy |
48|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|51
|Proposal Three: Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP|
Proposal Three: Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our Board of Directors has selected the firm of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.2024. KPMG LLP has served as our auditors since 1993. The Company and KPMG rotate KPMG’s lead audit engagement partner no less frequently than every five years. For this fiscal year ending December 31, 2022,2024, the KPMG lead audit engagement partner for the Company is in his secondfourth year in that role.
As part of its oversight responsibility, the Audit Committee, at least annually, evaluates theour independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence and reports its conclusions to theour Board. This evaluation was considered when deciding whether or not to reappoint KPMG LLP for the year ended December 31, 2022. Based upon this review, our2024. Our Board of Directors believes it is in the best interest of our Company and shareholders to retain KPMG LLP and has unanimously directed that the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm be submitted for ratification by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the annual meeting of shareholdersAnnual Meeting and will be provided the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire, and to respond to appropriate questions.
Shareholder ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our articles of incorporation or bylaws. However, theour Board of Directors is submitting ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to a shareholder vote as a matter of good corporate practice. If the shareholders do not ratify the selection,appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain KPMG LLP. In such event, the Audit Committee may retain KPMG LLP notwithstanding the fact that the shareholders did not ratify the selection,appointment or select another nationally recognized accounting firm without re-submitting the matter to a shareholder vote. Even if the selectionappointment is ratified, the Audit Committee retains the right in its discretion to select a different nationally recognized accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our shareholders and us.
All decisions regarding selection of independent registered public accounting firms and approval of accounting services and fees are made by our Audit Committee in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. There are no exceptions to the policy of securing pre-approval of the Audit Committee for any service provided by our independent registered public accounting firm.
The following table provides information relating to the fees billed or expected to be billed to Regency by KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020:2022:
| 2021 | 2020 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||
Audit fees(1)(2) | $1,993,625 | $1,970,000 | ||||||||||||||
Audit fees(1)(2) | ||||||||||||||||
Audit fees(1)(2) | ||||||||||||||||
Audit fees(1)(2) | $2,481,750 | $1,932,377 | ||||||||||||||
Audit-related fees | ||||||||||||||||
Audit-related fees | ||||||||||||||||
Audit-related fees | ||||||||||||||||
Audit-related fees | $— | $— | $— | $— | ||||||||||||
Tax fees(3)(4) | $368,286 | $343,326 | ||||||||||||||
Tax fees(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||
Tax fees(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||
Tax fees(3)(4) | $515,880 | $331,658 | ||||||||||||||
All other fees | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||
All other fees | ||||||||||||||||
All other fees | ||||||||||||||||
All other fees | $— | $— | ||||||||||||||
(1) Current year amounts include actual and estimated fees. The primary reason for the year over year increase in Audit fees relates to the additional audit work performed in connection with the acquisition of Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc.
(2) Audit fees consists of fees for professional services for the audit of our consolidated financial statements (Regency(including Regency Centers Corporation and Regency Centers, L.P. (collectively, the “Company”)) included in our annual report on Form 10-K and review of our condensed consolidated financial information included in our quarterly filings on Form 10-Q, including10-Q. Audit fees also include fees for all services required to comply with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and fees associated with performing the integrated audit of internal controls over financial reporting (Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 work), as well asand fees for services associated with comfort letters, reviews of documents filed with the SEC, and of consents on SEC registration statements.
(3) The Audit Committee discussed these services with KPMG LLP and determined that these services would not impair KPMG LLP’s independence.
(4) Consists of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services.
|
52|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|49
|Beneficial Ownership|
Beneficial Ownership of Principal Shareholders
The following table shows each person known to usRegency to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe the shareholders listed exercise sole voting and dispositive power over the shares. The percent of class shown below is based upon shares outstanding as of March 10, 2022.8, 2024.
Name(1) | Number of Shares Owned | Percent of Class | Number of Shares Owned | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 | 26,126,855 | (2) | 15.25 | % | ||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 | 28,058,356 | (2) | 15.19 | % | ||||||||||||
Capital World Investors 333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 | 17,851,008 | (3) | 10.42 | % | ||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | ||||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | ||||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | ||||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 17,670,922 | (4) | 10.31 | % | 19,269,562 | (3) | 10.43 | % | ||||||||
Norges Bank P.O. Box 1179 Sentrum NO 0107 Oslo Norway | 16,179,323 | (5) | 9.44 | % | ||||||||||||
Norges Bank P.O. Box 1179 Sentrum NO 0107 Oslo Norway | ||||||||||||||||
Norges Bank P.O. Box 1179 Sentrum NO 0107 Oslo Norway | ||||||||||||||||
Norges Bank P.O. Box 1179 Sentrum NO 0107 Oslo Norway | 17,018,543 | (4) | 9.21 | % | ||||||||||||
State Street Corporation One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 | 11,060,758 | (6) | 6.45 | % | ||||||||||||
State Street Corporation One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 | ||||||||||||||||
State Street Corporation One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 | ||||||||||||||||
State Street Corporation One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 | 12,892,463 | (5) | 6.98 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) Information presented in this table and related notes has been obtained from reports filed by the beneficial owner with the SEC.
(2) Information is as of December 31, 20212023 and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 202213, 2024 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. According to the information provided in the Schedule 13G, The Vanguard Group, Inc. has shared voting power over 430,573361,904 shares, sole dispositive power over 25,304,91727,188,510 shares and shared dispositive power over 821,938869,846 shares.
(3) Information is as of December 31, 2021 and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022 by Capital World Investors. According to the information provided in the Schedule 13G, Capital World Investors has sole voting power over 17,851,008 shares and sole dispositive power over 17,851,008 shares.
(4) Information is as of December 31, 20212023 and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 27, 202224, 2024 by BlackRock, Inc. According to the information provided in the Schedule 13G, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 15,146,17917,312,723 shares and sole dispositive power over 17,670,92219,269,562 shares.
(5)(4) Information is as of December 31, 20202023 and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2021February 5, 2024 by Norges Bank. According to the information provided in the Schedule 13G, Norges Bank has sole voting power over 16,179,32317,018,543 shares and sole dispositive power over 16,179,32317,018,543 shares.
(6)(5) Information is as of December 31, 20212023 and is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022January 29, 2024 by State Street Corporation. According to the information provided in the Schedule 13G, State Street Corporation has shared voting power over 9,007,9218,129,090 shares and shared dispositive power over 11,033,28012,868,055 shares.
50|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|53
|Beneficial Ownership|
Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows information relating to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 10, 2022,8, 2024, of each director and nominee, each of the executive officers named in the summary compensation table included in this proxy statement, and all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group. As of March 10, 2022,8, 2024, we had 171,372,553184,774,479 shares of common stock of Regency Centers Corporation issued and outstanding. Except as otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed exercise sole voting and dispositive power over the shares. No shares have been pledged as security by directors, nominees or executive officers.
Name | Number of Shares Owned(1) | Right to Acquire(2) | Percent of Class | Number of Shares Owned(1) | Right to Acquire(2) | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 970,011 | (3) | — | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin E. Stein, Jr. | 846,045 | (3) | — | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph F. Azrack | 14,902 | 2,053 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bryce Blair | 22,802 | 2,053 | * | 26,769 | 2,139 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | 86,058 | 2,215 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Ronald Blankenship | 104,073 | 2,309 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kristin A. Campbell | 627 | 2,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deirdre J. Evens | 8,759 | 2,053 | * | 16,369 | 2,139 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | 4,179 | 2,053 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas W. Furphy | 8,146 | 2,139 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karin M. Klein | 8,376 | 2,053 | * | 15,725 | 2,139 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | 39,520 | 2,053 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter D. Linneman | 46,654 | 2,139 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. O’Connor | 22,012 | 2,053 | * | 25,979 | 2,139 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | 74,089 | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lisa Palmer | 130,001 | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, II | — | 2,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas G. Wattles | 48,464 | 2,053 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James H. Simmons, III | 1,879 | 2,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 23,062 | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Mas | 61,924 | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
James D. Thompson | 37,567 | (4) | — | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan T. Roth | 20,901 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas Wibbenmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas Wibbenmeyer | 28,622 | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (a total of 14 persons) | 1,359,802 | 20,692 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (a total of 14 persons) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (a total of 14 persons) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (a total of 14 persons) | 1,333,714 | 19,421 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
* Less than one percent
(1) Excludes shares that may be acquired by directors or executive officers through the vesting of restricted stock or stock rights awards or stock option exercises.
(2) Shares that canmay be acquired through the vesting of stock rights awards within 60 days after the date of this proxy statement.
(3) Includes 158,759170,991 shares held in Regency’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan and 1,0012,095 shares held in Regency’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Also includes the following shares over which Mr. Stein is deemed to have shared voting and investment power:
| ◾ | 160,263 shares held by The Regency Group, Inc. All of the outstanding stock of The Regency Group, Inc. is owned by Mr. Stein and members of his family. |
| ◾ | 325,382 shares held by The Regency Group II and Regency Square II. Mr. Stein is a general partner of both partnerships. |
| ◾ | 4,000 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Stein by the Wellhouse Trust. Mr. Stein has investment power with respect to such shares. |
| ◾ | 24,201 shares held in grantor retained annuity trusts of which Mr. Stein is the trustee and his children are the beneficiaries. |
(4) Includes 1,222Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, officers and beneficial owners of 10% or more of our common shares heldto file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. We assist our directors and officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing these reports on their behalf. Based on the Company’s review, we believe that all required forms were filed for 2023, except for one Form 4 filing with respect to a trust forsingle transaction made on behalf one of our directors, Mr. Simmons, which Mr. Thompson is the co-trustee and 11,771 held by his spouse.was late due to an administrative error.
54|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|51
|Shareholder Proposals and Communications with the Board of Directors|
Shareholder Proposals and Communications with the Board of Directors
Shareholder Proposals
There are no shareholder proposals for consideration at our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Shareholders who may wish to make a proposalsubmit proposals, including director nominations, for consideration at our next annual meeting of shareholders expected to be includedheld in 2025, may do so as follows:
Shareholder Proposals
To submit a shareholder proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2025 Annual Meeting, a shareholder must submit the proposal in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, and formsuch proposal must be received by our Secretary by no later than November 20, 2024.
To submit a shareholder proposal for our 2025 Annual Meeting (other than a shareholder proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act), a shareholder must submit the proposal in accordance with our bylaws, and such proposal must be received by our Secretary by no earlier than January 1, 2025 (which is 120 calendar days prior to the anniversary of proxy relatingour 2024 Annual Meeting) and no later than January 31, 2025 (which is 90 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of our 2023 annual meeting or who wish2024 Annual Meeting). Please refer to presentSection 3.15 of our bylaws for more information regarding submission of a shareholder proposal at our 2023 annual meeting,other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
Proposals must provide a written copy of their proposalbe sent to our Secretary at our office at One Independent Drive, Suite 114, Jacksonville, Florida 32202 no later than November 18, 2022 (which is 120 calendar days prior to the anniversary of this year’s mailing date). Proposals must comply with the proxy rules relating to shareholder proposals to be included in our proxy materials. Notice to us of a shareholder proposal will be considered untimely if received by us after November 18, 2022 and the proposal will not be brought before the meeting. To ensure prompt receipt by us, proposals should be sent certified mail, return receipt requested.32202.
Shareholder Recommendations for Potential Director Nominees
Shareholders who wish to nominate a director nomineecandidate for election to our Board at our 2023 annual meeting2025 Annual Meeting must comply with the requirements of Section 240.14a-8 of the SEC Rules and send ussubmit notice of such nominations atin accordance with our principal executive officesbylaws, and such nominations must be received by our Secretary by no earlier than January 1, 2025 and no later than November 18, 2022. Nominations will be considered untimely if received by us after November 18, 2022 and will not be brought before the 2023 annual meeting.January 31, 2025. The mailing envelope should contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Shareholder Nomination for Director.” Please refer to Section 3.15 of our bylaws for detailed information regarding director candidate nominations, including specific requirements with respect to submissions.
To be eligibleIn addition, if a shareholder wishes to nominate a candidate for election to our Board at our 2025 Annual Meeting and elects to have such candidate included in our proxy statement for our 2025 Annual Meeting pursuant to our proxy access (as described under “Director Candidate Nominations Through Proxy Access” on page 19), shareholders need tobylaw, such nomination must comply with the notice, disclosure, eligibility and other requirements described in Section 3.18 of our bylaws, which are available onbylaws.
Any nominations must be sent to our websiteSecretary at www.regencycenters.com.our office at One Independent Drive, Suite 114, Jacksonville, Florida 32202.
Communication with the Board
Interested parties who wish to communicate with theour Board of Directors or with a particular director, including our independent Lead Director, may send a letter to the Secretary at our offices at One Independent Drive, Suite 114, Jacksonville, Florida 32202. The mailing envelope should contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Board Communication” or “Director Communication.” All such letters should identify the author and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or certain specified individual directors. The Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulatedeliver them to the appropriate director or directors.
* * * * * * * * *
The reports of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee included elsewhere in this proxy statement do not constitute soliciting materials and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing made by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate these reports by reference in another filing.
52|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|55
|Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting|
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting
Q: What are the procedures for attending and participating in the virtual Annual Meeting?
All shareholders are welcome to attend the Annual Meeting. The 2024 Annual Meeting will be virtual-only, held exclusively online. The platform for the virtual Annual Meeting includes functionality that affords authenticated shareholders comparable meeting participation rights and opportunities they would have at an in-person meeting. Instructions to access and log-in to the virtual Annual Meeting are provided below, and once admitted, shareholders may view reference materials, submit questions and vote their shares by following the instructions that will be available on the virtual meeting website.
To be admitted to the 2024 Annual Meeting, go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2024 and enter the 16-digit control number on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card.
Online access to the Annual Meeting will open at 7:45 AM Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 1, 2024 to allow time for you to log-in prior to the start of the live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting at 8:00 AM Eastern Time. If you are unable to locate your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card containing your 16-digit control number or otherwise to log-in as an authenticated shareholder, you may opt to participate in the Annual Meeting as a “guest,” in which case you will be able to hear the audio webcast but will not be able to utilize the question, voting or other functionality noted above. If you experience technical difficulties accessing or during the meeting, please call the technical support telephone number posted on the virtual meeting website.
Q: Why did I receive these materials?
Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for our 2022 annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting of shareholders.Shareholders. You are receiving athis proxy statement because you owned shares of our common stock on the record date, March 10, 2022,8, 2024, and that entitles you to vote at our annual meetingAnnual Meeting of shareholders,Shareholders, which will be held virtuallyexclusively online on April 29, 2022May 1, 2024 at 8:00 am, E.T., via live webcast,Eastern Time at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022.REG2024. By use of a proxy, you can vote
regardless if whether or not you participateattend in the Annual Meeting or not.Meeting. This proxy statement describes the matters on which we would like you to vote your shares and provides information on those matters so that you can make an informed decision.
Q: What information is contained in this proxy statement?
The information in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, our Board, and Board committees, the compensation of
compensation ofour directors and executive officers and other information that the SEC requires us to provide annually to our shareholders.
Q: Who What is a record date and who is entitled to vote?vote at the Annual Meeting?
HoldersA record date is the date, as of the close of business on which, shareholders of record are entitled to notice of and to vote at a meeting of shareholders. The record date for the 2024 Annual Meeting is March 8, 2024 and was established by our Board as required under the laws of Florida, our state of
incorporation. Thus, owners of record of shares of Regency Centers Corporation common stock as of the close of business on the record date, March 10, 2022, will8, 2024 are entitled to receive notice of and be eligible to vote beforeat the 2024 Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or
during the virtual meeting. At the close of business on the record date, we had outstanding and entitled to vote 171,372,553 shares of common stock. postponements thereof.
Q: How many votes do I have?
Each outstanding share of our common stock you owned as of the record date will be entitled to one
vote for each matter considered at the meeting.Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting.
Q: Who can participate in the Annual Meeting?
Persons with evidence of stock ownership as of the record date can participate in the virtual meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice or in your proxy card.
Only shareholders with a valid control number will be allowed to ask questions. Additional information regarding shareholder questions and participation, rules, procedures and technical support can be viewed seven days prior to the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022.
Q: What constitutes a quorum?
The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of the common stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum, permitting the conduct of business at the meeting. Proxies received
but marked as abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be included in the calculation of the number of votes considered to be present at the meeting for the purposes of a quorum.
Q: What vote is required to approve each item?
In the election of directors, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each nominee. In uncontested elections, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. Votes cast includes votes against but exclude abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to a nominee’s election. Our bylaws provide that the current term for a director in an uncontested
election who does not receive the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to such director’s election shall expire on the date that is the earlier of (i) 90 days from the date on which the voting results are determined or (ii) the date on which an individual is selected by the Board of Directors to fill the office held by such director.
56|REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|53
|Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting
For the advisory resolution on executive compensation and the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2022, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.”
Abstentions are not considered votes cast and will have no effect on whether these proposals are approved or nominees elected.
The advisory resolution on executive compensation, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, is non-binding on the Board of Directors. Although the vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of our executive compensation program.
The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public
accountants for fiscal 2022 will be approved if the votes cast “FOR” the proposal exceeds the votes cast “AGAINST” the proposal.
If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank or other nominee is permitted to vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accountants without receiving voting instructions from you. In contrast, all other proposals are “non-discretionary” items. This means brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients on these proposals may not vote on them. These so-called “broker non-votes” will be included in the calculation of the number of votes considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, but will not be considered in determining the number of votes necessary for approval and will have no effect on the outcome of any of the proposals.
Q: Will shareholders be asked to vote on any other matters?|
To the knowledge of the Company and its management, shareholders will vote only on the matters described in this proxy statement. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons designated as proxies will vote on those matters in the manner they consider appropriate.
If your shares are registered in your own name (instead of through a broker or other nominee), sign up to receive proxy materials in the future by accessing the Internet or via electronic delivery by visiting the following website: www.proxyvote.com.
Q: How do I vote?
If you are a holder of record (that is, your shares are registered in your own name with our transfer agent), you can votevote: by proxy prior to and without participating inattending the meetingAnnual Meeting; or via electronic meansonline during the virtual meetingAnnual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022.REG2024. We urge you to vote by proxy prior to the Annual Meeting even if you plan to participate inattend the virtual meetingAnnual Meeting so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present for usRegency to hold the meeting.Annual Meeting. Our Board of Directors has designated Martin E. Stein, Jr., Lisa Palmer, Michael J. Mas and each or any of them, as proxies to vote the shares of common stock solicited on its behalf. You can vote by proxy prior to the Annual Meeting by any of the following methods.methods:
Voting by Telephone or Throughby the Internet. If you are a registered shareholder (that is, if you own shares in your own name and not through a broker, bank or other nominee that holds shares for your account in a “street name” capacity), you may vote by proxy by using either the telephone or Internet methods of voting. Proxies submitted by telephone or through the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., eastern daylight time,Eastern Time, on April 28, 2022.30, 2024. Please see the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card for instructions on how to access the telephone and Internet voting systems.
Voting by Proxy CardMail. Each shareholder electing to receive shareholder materials by mail may vote by proxymail by
using the accompanying proxy card. When
you return a proxy card by mail that is properly signed and completed, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted as you specify on the proxy card.
If you hold your shares in “street name,” we have supplied copies of our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting to the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares of record and they have the responsibility to send these proxy materials to you. You must either direct the bank, broker or other nominee as to how to vote your shares. Please refer to the voter instruction cards used by your bank, broker or other nominee for specific instructions on methods of voting, including by telephone or using the Internet.
Your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you return the proxy card but you do not indicate your voting preferences, then your shares will not be voted with respect to any proposal other than the ratification of our auditors. The Board and management do not intend to present any matters at this time at the Annual Meeting other than those outlined in the notice of the Annual Meeting. ShouldIf any other matter requiring a votematters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, your shares will be voted at the discretion of shareholders arise, shareholders returning the proxy card confer upon the individuals designated as proxies discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by such proxy on any such other matter in accordance with their best judgment.holders.
54| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting |
Q: Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?
Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before your shares are voted at the proxy is exercisedAnnual Meeting by filing a notice of revocation with the Secretary of the Company or mailing a proxy bearing a later date, submitting your proxy again by telephone or over the Internet. For shares you hold beneficially in “street name,” you may revoke your proxy or change your vote by submitting new voting
instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee or, if you have obtained a legal proxy“brokers proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by participating inattending and voting your shares at the meeting.Annual Meeting. In either case, the powers of the proxy holders will be suspended if you participate inattend the meetingAnnual Meeting and so request, although participation inattending the meetingAnnual Meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
Q: What vote is required to approve each item?
For Proposal 1: Election of Directors, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each nominee. In uncontested elections, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. Votes cast includes votes against but exclude abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to a nominee’s election. Abstentions are not considered votes cast and will have no effect on whether these proposals are approved or nominees elected. Our bylaws provide that the current term for a director in an uncontested election who does not receive the vote of the majority of the votes cast
with respect to such director’s election shall expire on the date that is the earlier of (i) 90 days from the date on which the voting results are determined or (ii) the date on which an individual is selected by the Board of Directors to fill the office held by such director.
For Proposal 2: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation, which is commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote and non-binding on our Board, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. Although the vote is non-binding, our Board and
REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |57
| Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting
Compensation Committee will consider the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of our executive compensation program.
For Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal 2024, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN”. This proposal will be approved if the votes cast “FOR” exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” the proposal.
If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank or other nominee is permitted to vote your shares on Proposal 3: Ratification of Appointment of
KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm without receiving voting instructions from you. In contrast, all other proposals are “non-discretionary” items. This means brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients on these proposals may not vote on them. These so-called “broker non-votes” will be included in the calculation of the number of votes considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, but will not be considered in determining the number of votes necessary for approval and will have no effect on the outcome of any of the proposals.
Q: What constitutes a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares that must be represented in person or by proxy for our Company to conduct the 2024 Annual Meeting. The attendance in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the 2024 Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum to hold the 2024 Annual Meeting. Shareholders who attend the 2024 Annual Meeting
that are admitted pursuant to the instructions to join the virtual meeting as an authenticated shareholder will be considered to be attending the meeting in person. If you grant your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by your proxy card, your shares will be considered present at the 2024 Annual Meeting and counted toward the quorum.
Q: Will shareholders be asked to vote on any other matters?
To the knowledge of the Company and its management, shareholders will vote only on the matters described in this proxy statement. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, your shares will be voted at the discretion of the proxy holders.
Q: How are we soliciting this proxy?proxies?
We are soliciting this proxyproxies on behalf of our Board of Directors and will pay all expenses associated with this solicitation. In addition to mailing these proxy materials, certain of our officers and other employees may, without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies through further mailing or personal conversations, or by
telephone or other
electronic means. We will also, upon request, reimburse brokers and other persons holding stock in their names, or in the names of nominees, for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our stock and to obtain proxies.
Q: If I previously signed up to receive shareholder materials, including proxy statements and annual reports, by mail and now wish to access these materials via the Internet or via electronic delivery in the future, what should I do?
If you have previously signed up to receive shareholder materials, including proxy statements and annual reports, by mail, you may choose to receive these materials by accessing the Internet or via electronic delivery in the future. You can help us achieve a substantial reduction in our printing and mailing costs by choosing to receive shareholder materials by means other than mail. If you choose to receive your proxy materials by accessing the
Internet, then before next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, you will receive a
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials when the proxy materials and annual report are available over the Internet.
If you choose instead to receive your proxy materials via electronic delivery, you will receive an email containing the proxy materials.
58| REGENCY CENTERS | 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting |
Q: How can I obtain paper copies of the proxy materials, annual report on Form 10-K and other financial information?
Shareholders can access our 20222024 proxy statement, our annual report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC as well as our corporate governance and other related information on the Investors page of our website at www.regencycenters.com.
The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.
The SEC’s rules permit us to deliver a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or single set of Annual Meeting materials to one address shared by two or more of our shareholders. This delivery method is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant cost savings. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one notice, proxy statement and annual report
to multiple shareholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from the impacted shareholders prior to the mailing date.
We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Notice or annual meeting materials, as requested, to any shareholder at the shared address to which a single copy of those documents was delivered. If you are currently a shareholder sharing an address with another shareholder and wish to receive only one copy of future Notices, proxy statements and annual reports for your household, please write to Joni Bonnell at the address specified in this section.
If you elected to receive our shareholder materials via the Internet or via electronic delivery, you may request paper copies, without charge, by written request addressed to the address set forth in this section.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |55
| Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Our Annual Meeting
Your election to receive your proxy materials by accessing the Internet or by electronic delivery will remain in effect for all future shareholder meetings unless you revoke it before the meeting by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or by calling or sending a written request addressed to:
Regency Centers Corporation
Attn: Joni BonnellReiser
One Independent Drive, Suite 114
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
(904) 598-7761
If you hold your shares in an account at a brokerage firm or bank participating in a “street name” program, you can sign up for electronic delivery of proxy materials in the future by contacting your broker.
Q: What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?
You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this proxy statement, proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account
in which you hold shares. If you are a shareholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please vote your shares applicable to each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive.
Q: Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
The Company will announce the preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and release the final results in a Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission within four business days following the annual meeting.
Q: Where can I find a list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
The names of shareholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting will be available to
shareholders at our corporate
office for a period of 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting and continuing throughduring the Annual Meeting.
Q: Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
56|
The Company will announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and intends to release
the final results in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT|59
Appendix A—Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
Appendix A—Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Defined Terms
In addition to the required GAAP presentations, the Company uses certain non-GAAP performance measures, as it believes these measures improve the understanding of the Company’s operational results. Management continually evaluates the usefulness, relevance, limitations, and calculation of the Company’s reported non-GAAP performance measures to determine how best to provide relevant information to the public, and thus such reported measures could change.
| ◾ | Core Operating Earnings is an additional performance measure |
| ◾ | Development Completion is a |
| ◾ | Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is |
| ◾ | Nareit EBITDAre is a measure of REIT performance, which the |
| ◾ | Nareit Funds From Operations (“Nareit FFO”) |
| ◾ | Net Operating Income (“NOI”) is the sum of base rent, percentage rent, recoveries from tenants, other lease income, and other property income, less operating and maintenance expenses, real estate taxes, ground rent, and uncollectible lease income. NOI excludes straight-line rental income and expense, above and below market rent and ground rent amortization, tenant lease inducement amortization, and other fees. |
| ◾ | A Non-Same Property is |
| ◾ | Operating EBITDArebegins with Nareit |
| ◾ | Property In Development includes properties in various stages of ground-up development. |
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |A-1
| Appendix A—Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
| ◾ |
|
Property In Redevelopment |
| ◾ | Pro Rata information includes 100% of our consolidated properties plus our economic share (based on our ownership interest) in our unconsolidated real estate investment partnerships. We provide Pro-rata financial information because we believe it assists investors and analysts in estimating our economic interest in our consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships, when read in conjunction with our reported results under GAAP. We believe presenting our Pro-rata share of assets, liabilities, operating results, and other metrics, along with certain other non-GAAP measures, makes comparisons of our operating results to those of other REITs more meaningful. The Pro-rata information provided is not, nor is it intended to be, presented in accordance with GAAP. The Pro-rata supplemental details of assets and liabilities and supplemental details of operations reflect our proportionate economic ownership of the assets, liabilities, and operating results of the properties in our portfolio. The Pro-rata information is prepared on a basis consistent with the comparable consolidated amounts and is intended to more accurately reflect our proportionate economic interest in the assets, liabilities, and operating results of properties in our portfolio. We do not control the unconsolidated investment partnerships, and the Pro-rata presentations of the assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses do not represent our legal claim to such items. The partners are entitled to profit or loss allocations and distributions of cash flows according to the operating agreements, which generally provide for such allocations according to their invested capital. Our share of invested capital establishes the ownership interests we use to prepare our Pro-rata share. |
The presentation of Pro-rata information has limitations which include, but are not limited to, the following:
| ◾ | The amounts shown on the individual line items were derived by applying our overall economic ownership interest percentage determined when applying the equity method of accounting and do not necessarily represent our legal claim to the assets and liabilities, or the revenues and expenses; and |
| ◾ | Other companies in our industry may calculate their Pro-rata interest differently, limiting the comparability of Pro-rata information. |
Because of these limitations, the Pro-rata financial information should not be considered independently or as a substitute for our financial statements as reported under GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP financial statements, using the Pro-rata information as a supplement.
| ◾ | Redevelopment Completionis a |
| ◾ | Retail Operating Property is any retail property not termed a Property in Development. A retail property is any property where the majority of the income is generated from retail uses. |
| ◾ | Same Property |
| ◾ | Same Property NOI is provided because we believe the measure provides investors with additional information regarding the operating performances of comparable assets. Same Property NOI excludes all development, non-same property and corporate level revenues and expenses. The Company also provides disclosure of NOI excluding |
A-2| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Appendix A—Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Common StockholdersShareholders to Nareit FFO and Core Operating Earnings (in thousands)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 20212023 and 20202022
| 2021 | 2020 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit FFO: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit FFO: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit FFO: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit FFO: | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders | $361,411 | $44,889 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders | $359,500 | 482,865 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit Funds From Operations(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit Funds From Operations(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit Funds From Operations(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit Funds From Operations(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (excluding FF&E) | 330,364 | 375,865 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (excluding FF&E) | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (excluding FF&E) | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (excluding FF&E) | 378,400 | 344,629 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment | — | 132,128 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | (3,822 | ) | (121,835 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax | (100,499 | ) | (69,879 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for impairment of real estate | 95,815 | 18,778 | ||||||||||||||
Exchangeable operating partnership units | ||||||||||||||||
Exchangeable operating partnership units | ||||||||||||||||
Exchangeable operating partnership units | ||||||||||||||||
Exchangeable operating partnership units | 1,615 | 203 | 2,008 | 2,105 | ||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | $688,706 | $501,984 | ||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | $736,086 | 707,764 | ||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit FFO to Core Operating Earnings: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit FFO to Core Operating Earnings: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit FFO to Core Operating Earnings: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit FFO to Core Operating Earnings: | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | $688,706 | $501,984 | ||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit Funds From Operations | $736,086 | 707,764 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Core Operating Earnings(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Core Operating Earnings(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Core Operating Earnings(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Core Operating Earnings(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | — | 22,043 | ||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | ||||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | ||||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | (99 | ) | 176 | |||||||||||||
Promote income | (13,589 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | ||||||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | ||||||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | ||||||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | 4,620 | — | ||||||||||||||
Straight line rent | (13,534 | ) | (15,605 | ) | ||||||||||||
Straight-line rent | ||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rent | ||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rent | ||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rent | (11,060 | ) | (11,327 | ) | ||||||||||||
Uncollectible straight line rent | (5,965 | ) | 39,255 | |||||||||||||
Uncollectible straight-line rent | ||||||||||||||||
Uncollectible straight-line rent | ||||||||||||||||
Uncollectible straight-line rent | ||||||||||||||||
Uncollectible straight-line rent | (1,174 | ) | (14,155 | ) | ||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | (23,889 | ) | (41,293 | ) | ||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | ||||||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | ||||||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | (29,869 | ) | (21,434 | ) | ||||||||||||
Debt premium/discount amortization | (565 | ) | (1,233 | ) | ||||||||||||
Debt and derivative mark-to-market amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Debt and derivative mark-to-market amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Debt and derivative mark-to-market amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Debt and derivative mark-to-market amortization | 2,352 | (184 | ) | |||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings | $631,164 | $505,151 | ||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings | $700,856 | 660,840 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders per Share (Diluted) | $2.12 | $0.26 | ||||||||||||||
Impact of Covid-related collections and/or prior period recoveries | ||||||||||||||||
Impact of Covid-related collections and/or prior period recoveries | ||||||||||||||||
Impact of Covid-related collections and/or prior period recoveries | ||||||||||||||||
Impact of Covid-related collections and/or prior period recoveries | $4,409 | $24,970 | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings | $696,447 | $635,870 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per Share (Diluted) | $2.04 | 2.81 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Earnings per Share (Diluted) | 170,694 | 169,460 | 176,371 | 171,791 | ||||||||||||
Nareit FFO per Share (Diluted) | $4.02 | $2.95 | ||||||||||||||
Nareit FFO per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit FFO per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit FFO per Share (Diluted) | $4.15 | 4.10 | ||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | $3.68 | $2.97 | ||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | $3.95 | 3.83 | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | $3.93 | $3.69 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Nareit FFO and Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | 171,456 | 170,225 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Nareit FFO and Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Nareit FFO and Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares For Nareit FFO and Core Operating Earnings per Share (Diluted) | 177,324 | 172,540 | ||||||||||||||
(1) Includes Regency’s consolidated entities and its Pro-rata share of unconsolidated co-investmentreal estate partnerships, net of Pro-rata share attributable to noncontrolling interests.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |A-3
| Appendix A—Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Common StockholdersShareholders to Pro-Rata Same Property NOI (in thousands)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 20212023 and 20202022
| 2021 | 2020 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||
Net Income attributable to common stockholders | $361,411 | $44,889 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income attributable to common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income attributable to common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income attributable to common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income attributable to common Shareholders | $359,500 | 482,865 | ||||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Management, transaction, and other fees | (40,337 | ) | (26,501 | ) | ||||||||||||
Management, transaction, and other fees | ||||||||||||||||
Management, transaction, and other fees | ||||||||||||||||
Management, transaction, and other fees | (26,954 | ) | (25,851 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Other(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Other(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Other(1) | (46,860 | ) | (25,912 | ) | (46,084 | ) | (51,090 | ) | ||||||||
Plus: | ||||||||||||||||
Plus: | ||||||||||||||||
Plus: | ||||||||||||||||
Plus: | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 303,331 | 345,900 | 352,282 | 319,697 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 78,218 | 75,001 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 97,806 | 79,903 | ||||||||||||||
Other operating expense | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expense | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expense | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expense | 5,751 | 12,642 | 9,459 | 6,166 | ||||||||||||
Other expense | 132,977 | 256,407 | ||||||||||||||
Other expense | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense | 147,824 | 44,102 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income of investments in real estate excluded from NOI(2) | 53,119 | 59,726 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships excluded from NOI(2) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships excluded from NOI(2) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships excluded from NOI(2) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships excluded from NOI(2) | 46,088 | 35,824 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 4,877 | 2,428 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 6,310 | 5,170 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | 5,057 | — | ||||||||||||||
NOI | ||||||||||||||||
NOI | ||||||||||||||||
NOI | ||||||||||||||||
NOI | 852,487 | 744,580 | 951,288 | 896,786 | ||||||||||||
Less non-same property NOI(3) | (3,314 | ) | (11,472 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less non-same property NOI(3) | ||||||||||||||||
Less non-same property NOI(3) | ||||||||||||||||
Less non-same property NOI(3) | (41,692 | ) | (5,141 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same Property NOI | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI | $849,173 | $733,108 | $909,596 | 891,645 | ||||||||||||
% change | 15.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees | $842,727 | $725,358 | $901,763 | 886,638 | ||||||||||||
% change | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Redevelopments | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Redevelopments | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Redevelopments | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Redevelopments | $752,604 | $648,348 | $771,510 | 764,610 | ||||||||||||
% change | 16.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Collection of 2020/2021 Reserves | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Collection of 2020/2021 Reserves | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Collection of 2020/2021 Reserves | ||||||||||||||||
Same Property NOI without Termination Fees or Collection of 2020/2021 Reserves | $897,354 | 866,588 | ||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | ||||||||||||||||
% change | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) Includes straight-line rental income and expense, net of reserves, above and below market rent amortization, other fees, and noncontrolling interests.
(2) Includes non-NOI income and expenses incurred at our unconsolidated real estate partnerships, such as, but not limited to, straight-line rental income, above and below market rent amortization, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, and real estate gains and impairments.
(3) Includes revenues and expenses attributable to Non-Same Properties, Projects in Development, corporate activities, and noncontrolling interests.
A-4| REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT
Appendix A—Definitions and Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit EBITDAre and Operating EBITDAre (in thousands)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 20212023 and 20202022
| 2021 | 2020 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Nareit EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income | $366,288 | 47,317 | $370,867 | 488,035 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Nareit EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 166,043 | 181,043 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 176,528 | 166,495 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | 943 | (357 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 895 | (39 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 335,424 | 380,408 | 383,063 | 349,476 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | (100,499 | ) | (69,879 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | (3,822 | ) | (121,753 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision from impairment of real estate | 95,815 | 18,778 | ||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | $927,531 | 882,214 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment | — | 132,128 | ||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | $864,014 | 689,438 | ||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit EBITDAre to Operating EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit EBITDAre to Operating EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit EBITDAre to Operating EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Nareit EBITDAre to Operating EBITDAre: | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | $864,014 | 689,438 | ||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Nareit EBITDAre | $927,531 | 882,214 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Operating EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Operating EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Operating EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to Operating EBITDAre(1): | ||||||||||||||||
Transaction Income (JV Promote) | (13,589 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | ||||||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | ||||||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | ||||||||||||||||
Merger transition costs | 4,620 | — | ||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | — | 22,043 | ||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | ||||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | ||||||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of debt | (99 | ) | 176 | |||||||||||||
Straight line rent, net | (19,579 | ) | (23,546 | ) | ||||||||||||
Straight-line rent, net | ||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rent, net | ||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rent, net | ||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rent, net | (12,594 | ) | (25,620 | ) | ||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | ||||||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | ||||||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | ||||||||||||||||
Above/below market rent amortization, net | (23,958 | ) | (41,379 | ) | (29,863 | ) | (21,439 | ) | ||||||||
Operating EBITDAre | $806,888 | 693,648 | ||||||||||||||
Operating EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Operating EBITDAre | ||||||||||||||||
Operating EBITDAre | $889,595 | 835,331 | ||||||||||||||
(1) Includes Regency’s consolidated entities and its pro-rata share of unconsolidated co-investment partnerships.
REGENCY CENTERS | 2022 2024 PROXY STATEMENT |A-5
REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION ONE INDEPENDENT DRIVE, SUITE 114 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202 SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w VOTE BY INTERNET—INTERNET Before The Meeting—Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 30, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Followweb site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Meeting—Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022REG2024 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.on April 30, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL (ONLY IF NOT VOTING BY INTERNET OR PHONE) Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION ONE INDEPENDENT DRIVE, SUITE 114 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202 Regency centers. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEPV33643-P07190KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR“FOR” each of the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees to each serve for a one-year term. Nominees:For Against Abstain 1a. Martin1a.Martin E. Stein, Jr. For Against Abstain 1b. Bryce Blair 1k. Thomas G. Wattles 1c. C. Ronald Blankenship !!!The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR“FOR” eachForAgainstAbstain of proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 1d. Deirdre J. Evens 2. Adoption of3: 1b.Bryce Blair!!!2.Approval, in an advisory resolution approving executive compensation for fiscal year 2021. 1e. Thomas W. Furphy 3. Ratificationvote, of the Company’s executive!!! compensation. 1c.C. Ronald Blankenship!!!3.Ratification of appointment of KPMG LLP as thethe!!! Company’s independent registered public accounting 1d.Kristin A. Campbell!!!firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. 1f. Karin M. Klein 1g. Peter D. Linneman2024. NOTE: SuchThe named proxies also are authorized, in their 1e.Deirdre J. Evens!!!discretion, to consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the meetingAnnual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment adjournments or postponements 1f.Thomas W. Furphy!!!thereof. 1h. David1g.Karin M. Klein!!! 1h.Peter D. Linneman!!! 1i.David P. O’Connor 1i. Lisa Palmer 1j. JamesO’Connor!!! 1j.Lisa Palmer!!! 1k.James H. Simmons, IIIIII!!! Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. 0000532537_1 R1.0.0.24 Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date SignatureDateSignature (Joint Owners)Date
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.comwww.proxyvote.com. V33644-P07190 REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 29, 2022May 1, 2024 8:00 AM, EDTEastern Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Regency Centers Corporation The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Martin E. Stein, Jr., Lisa Palmer, Michael J. Mas and each or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually at 8:00 AM, EDTEastern Time on April 29, 2022,May 1, 2024, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REG2022REG2024 and any adjournmentadjournments or postponementpostponements thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. 0000532537_2 R1.0.0.24 Continued and to be signed on reverse side